[GHSA-jjjh-jjxp-wpff] Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Jackson-databind by astashys · Pull Request #4796 · github/advisory-database · GitHub
Skip to content

[GHSA-jjjh-jjxp-wpff] Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Jackson-databind - #4796

Closed
astashys wants to merge 1 commit into
astashys/advisory-improvement-4796from
astashys-GHSA-jjjh-jjxp-wpff
Closed

astashys wants to merge 1 commit into
astashys/advisory-improvement-4796from
astashys-GHSA-jjjh-jjxp-wpff

Conversation

@astashys

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products

Comments
it seems like CVE-2022-42003 was fixed in jackson-databind with version 2.13.4.1 (12-Oct-2022) according to the release notes: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/04a6719805a26b4e5699285b7110ec1bfd655365/release-notes/VERSION-2.x#L561

@github-actions
github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to astashys/advisory-improvement-4796 September 12, 2024 10:00
@darakian

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@astashys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The reason for my request is to eliminate the difference between databases.
Having different severities in different databases is common, but having different information about which versions are vulnerable is inconvenient when using different scanning tools.
Snyk says 2.13.4.1 is not vulnerable but Grype says it is vulnerable.
In our case, our partner using Snyk was confident that his application didn't contain vulnerable 3rd party dependencies and delivered a release but we got different results using Grype.
In the opposite case, I would ask Snyk to revise the versions but in this particular case, it seems technically correct to make changes here.
I hope consistency is a good reason to make the change.

@darakian

darakian commented Sep 13, 2024 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the astashys-GHSA-jjjh-jjxp-wpff branch September 13, 2024 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants