{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Add self-baseline-last - #17476
Merged
Merged
Add self-baseline-last#17476
self-baseline-last#17476Conversation
philipp-spiess
force-pushed
the
feat/self-content-baseline-last
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 1, 2025 11:30
86ace9e to
b5ee032
Compare
self-baseline-last and content-baseline-lastself-baseline-last
philipp-spiess
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 1, 2025 11:32
philipp-spiess
force-pushed
the
feat/self-content-baseline-last
branch
from
April 1, 2025 11:32
b5ee032 to
466e4ad
Compare
philipp-spiess
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 1, 2025 11:34
thecrypticace
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2025
28 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This PR also adds a new
self-baseline-lastutility similar toitems-baseline-lastadded previously. We've also discussed adding acontent-baseline-lastutility but since the browser support for this is very limited and we weren't able to get this to do anything even in the supported browsers, we decided against it.Test plan
Updated the utility tests.