chore: Migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage by gurusai-voleti · Pull Request #2707 · googleapis/google-api-python-client · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: Migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage#2707

Closed
gurusai-voleti wants to merge 2 commits into
googleapis:mainfrom
gurusai-voleti:ai-gsutil-migration-39f5b0cc3380421c9672c620576b497e
Closed

chore: Migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage#2707
gurusai-voleti wants to merge 2 commits into
googleapis:mainfrom
gurusai-voleti:ai-gsutil-migration-39f5b0cc3380421c9672c620576b497e

Conversation

@gurusai-voleti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: gcs-cli-hyd@google.com

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@gurusai-voleti gurusai-voleti requested a review from a team January 23, 2026 08:52
@gurusai-voleti gurusai-voleti requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2026 08:52
@gurusai-voleti gurusai-voleti requested review from a team and m-strzelczyk January 23, 2026 08:52
@product-auto-label product-auto-label Bot added the size: s Pull request size is small. label Jan 23, 2026
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request automates the migration from gsutil to gcloud storage across various files, including shell scripts and documentation. The automated replacements of commands like gsutil cp to gcloud storage cp and gsutil mb to gcloud storage buckets create are correct. I have left one comment on an outdated comment in a shell script that should be updated for maintainability. Otherwise, the changes look good. As noted in the pull request description, please ensure these changes are thoroughly tested.

Comment thread samples/prediction/setup.sh Outdated
@chalmerlowe

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gurusai-voleti

Is this ready for review? It looks like there is an open comment that needs resolution and it looks like in the last commit, several items were reverted and I am not sure that that is what we want. Please advise. Thanks.

@gurusai-voleti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gurusai-voleti

Is this ready for review? It looks like there is an open comment that needs resolution and it looks like in the last commit, several items were reverted and I am not sure that that is what we want. Please advise. Thanks.

yes the PR is ready for review, the changes reverted are already in PR's #2706 and #2705

@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These files are auto-generated from Discovery files, which in turn come from internal API definitions. Any changes made directly here will be overwritten next time an internal change propagates.

Please contact the appropriate API teams internally to update their files. When those changes are released and propagate to the Discovery server, this repo will eventually pick them up.

@gurusai-voleti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size: s Pull request size is small.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants