{{ message }}
Add NOT IN coverage for integer IN list tests#23308
Draft
alamb wants to merge 7 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
We are adding SQL-level coverage for the integer IN list specialization paths. #23305 adds the initial integer
INcoverage.This PR adds paired
NOT INcoverage so the SLT file also exercises the negated IN list implementation paths while keeping the expected results easy to audit.What changes are included in this PR?
NOT INchecks for the existing integer IN list queriesAre these changes tested?
Only tests
Are there any user-facing changes?
No