Suite cache should not be saved for packages that are not suites by jgebal · Pull Request #1313 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL · GitHub
Skip to content

Suite cache should not be saved for packages that are not suites#1313

Merged
jgebal merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
bugfix/suite_cache_populated_for_non_suites_1278
Mar 15, 2026
Merged

Suite cache should not be saved for packages that are not suites#1313
jgebal merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
bugfix/suite_cache_populated_for_non_suites_1278

Conversation

@jgebal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jgebal jgebal commented Mar 15, 2026

There was a bug in ut_suite_cache_manager that was causing packages that had comments captured as annotations ( the --%) to be saved in suite cache and considered as test suites.
Those packages were then getting excluded form coverage report.

Only packages that contain suite information should be considered test suites and should eb added to suite cahge.
The annotation parsing remains independent from suite constriction and therefore all lines with comment --% are still saved in annotation cache.

Resolves #1278

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Mar 15, 2026

…` are getting populated even package is not a suite.
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.08%. Comparing base (c243e4e) to head (f3c0d3f).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1313      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    95.04%   95.08%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          111      111              
  Lines         5369     5369              
  Branches        33       33              
===========================================
+ Hits          5103     5105       +2     
+ Misses         266      264       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
19se 95.13% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
21XE 95.28% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
23-free 95.02% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jgebal jgebal requested a review from lwasylow March 15, 2026 11:28
@jgebal jgebal merged commit d7c0005 into develop Mar 15, 2026
17 checks passed
@jgebal jgebal deleted the bugfix/suite_cache_populated_for_non_suites_1278 branch March 15, 2026 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Coverage not being reported when comment starts with --%param

2 participants