Bump splunk/splunk from 6.6.0 to 8.2.3 in /ci/splunk by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #1 · stackrox/stackrox · GitHub
Skip to content

Bump splunk/splunk from 6.6.0 to 8.2.3 in /ci/splunk#1

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dependabot/docker/ci/splunk/splunk/splunk-8.2.3
Closed

Bump splunk/splunk from 6.6.0 to 8.2.3 in /ci/splunk#1
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dependabot/docker/ci/splunk/splunk/splunk-8.2.3

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Dec 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps splunk/splunk from 6.6.0 to 8.2.3.

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file docker Pull requests that update Docker code labels Dec 1, 2021
@viswajithiii

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps splunk/splunk from 6.6.0 to 8.2.3.

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: splunk/splunk
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot force-pushed the dependabot/docker/ci/splunk/splunk/splunk-8.2.3 branch from 56f5340 to 680a821 Compare December 7, 2021 23:59
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tag for build #5791 is 3.67.x-100-g680a821de9.

💻 For deploying this image using the dev scripts, run the following first:

export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG='3.67.x-100-g680a821de9'

📦 You can also generate an installation bundle with:

docker run -i --rm stackrox/main:3.67.x-100-g680a821de9 central generate interactive > bundle.zip

🕹️ A roxctl binary artifact can be downloaded from CircleCI.

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Dec 15, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@dependabot dependabot Bot closed this Dec 15, 2021
@dependabot dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/docker/ci/splunk/splunk/splunk-8.2.3 branch December 15, 2021 05:19
gavin-stackrox added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2022
clickboo added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2022
c-du added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2023
ivan-degtiarenko added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
@msugakov msugakov mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2023
5 tasks
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2024
Signed-off-by: J. Victor Martins <jvdm@sdf.org>
@dashrews78 dashrews78 mentioned this pull request May 12, 2025
9 tasks
jvdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
@dcaravel dcaravel mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2026
6 tasks
GrimmiMeloni added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
…scriptors

Address three critical issues identified in code quality review:

Critical Issue #1: Unchecked Type Assertions
- Add checked type assertions at lines 29-42 for spec, crds, owned fields
- Add checked assertions at lines 46-60 for CRD and descriptor entries
- Add checked assertions at lines 84-89 in fixDescriptorOrder for path fields
- Add checked assertion at line 133-136 for currentPath field
- All failures now have proper error handling instead of panics

Critical Issue #2: Path Resolution Bug
- Fix lines 138-142 to check for strings.LastIndex returning -1
- Handle top-level paths (no dots) gracefully with early continue
- Prevents index-out-of-bounds panic when processing top-level fields

Critical Issue #3: URN Value Handling
- Fix line 125 to use strings.Join(parts[6:], ":")
- Preserves colons in URN values instead of truncating after first colon
- Handles values like "database:enabled" correctly

All existing tests pass. The tool now handles malformed input gracefully
with clear error messages instead of panicking.

This code was partially generated with AI assistance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GrimmiMeloni added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2026
…scriptors

Address three critical issues identified in code quality review:

Critical Issue #1: Unchecked Type Assertions
- Add checked type assertions at lines 29-42 for spec, crds, owned fields
- Add checked assertions at lines 46-60 for CRD and descriptor entries
- Add checked assertions at lines 84-89 in fixDescriptorOrder for path fields
- Add checked assertion at line 133-136 for currentPath field
- All failures now have proper error handling instead of panics

Critical Issue #2: Path Resolution Bug
- Fix lines 138-142 to check for strings.LastIndex returning -1
- Handle top-level paths (no dots) gracefully with early continue
- Prevents index-out-of-bounds panic when processing top-level fields

Critical Issue #3: URN Value Handling
- Fix line 125 to use strings.Join(parts[6:], ":")
- Preserves colons in URN values instead of truncating after first colon
- Handles values like "database:enabled" correctly

All existing tests pass. The tool now handles malformed input gracefully
with clear error messages instead of panicking.

This code was partially generated with AI assistance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GrimmiMeloni added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2026
…scriptors

Address three critical issues identified in code quality review:

Critical Issue #1: Unchecked Type Assertions
- Add checked type assertions at lines 29-42 for spec, crds, owned fields
- Add checked assertions at lines 46-60 for CRD and descriptor entries
- Add checked assertions at lines 84-89 in fixDescriptorOrder for path fields
- Add checked assertion at line 133-136 for currentPath field
- All failures now have proper error handling instead of panics

Critical Issue #2: Path Resolution Bug
- Fix lines 138-142 to check for strings.LastIndex returning -1
- Handle top-level paths (no dots) gracefully with early continue
- Prevents index-out-of-bounds panic when processing top-level fields

Critical Issue #3: URN Value Handling
- Fix line 125 to use strings.Join(parts[6:], ":")
- Preserves colons in URN values instead of truncating after first colon
- Handles values like "database:enabled" correctly

All existing tests pass. The tool now handles malformed input gracefully
with clear error messages instead of panicking.

This code was partially generated with AI assistance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GrimmiMeloni added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2026
…scriptors

Address three critical issues identified in code quality review:

Critical Issue #1: Unchecked Type Assertions
- Add checked type assertions at lines 29-42 for spec, crds, owned fields
- Add checked assertions at lines 46-60 for CRD and descriptor entries
- Add checked assertions at lines 84-89 in fixDescriptorOrder for path fields
- Add checked assertion at line 133-136 for currentPath field
- All failures now have proper error handling instead of panics

Critical Issue #2: Path Resolution Bug
- Fix lines 138-142 to check for strings.LastIndex returning -1
- Handle top-level paths (no dots) gracefully with early continue
- Prevents index-out-of-bounds panic when processing top-level fields

Critical Issue #3: URN Value Handling
- Fix line 125 to use strings.Join(parts[6:], ":")
- Preserves colons in URN values instead of truncating after first colon
- Handles values like "database:enabled" correctly

All existing tests pass. The tool now handles malformed input gracefully
with clear error messages instead of panicking.

This code was partially generated with AI assistance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GrimmiMeloni added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2026
…scriptors

Address three critical issues identified in code quality review:

Critical Issue #1: Unchecked Type Assertions
- Add checked type assertions at lines 29-42 for spec, crds, owned fields
- Add checked assertions at lines 46-60 for CRD and descriptor entries
- Add checked assertions at lines 84-89 in fixDescriptorOrder for path fields
- Add checked assertion at line 133-136 for currentPath field
- All failures now have proper error handling instead of panics

Critical Issue #2: Path Resolution Bug
- Fix lines 138-142 to check for strings.LastIndex returning -1
- Handle top-level paths (no dots) gracefully with early continue
- Prevents index-out-of-bounds panic when processing top-level fields

Critical Issue #3: URN Value Handling
- Fix line 125 to use strings.Join(parts[6:], ":")
- Preserves colons in URN values instead of truncating after first colon
- Handles values like "database:enabled" correctly

All existing tests pass. The tool now handles malformed input gracefully
with clear error messages instead of panicking.

This code was partially generated with AI assistance.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
janisz added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
#20126)

Co-authored-by: bradr5 <braroger@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Tomasz Janiszewski <tomek@redhat.com>
davdhacs added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2026
Tested three image loading approaches on GHA:
1. ctr pull inside KinD: 62s auth wait — FASTEST (compressed download)
2. docker save single tar | ctr import: 92s — slow (uncompressed 3GB)
3. docker pull + parallel per-image save | import: 82-96s — still slow

ctr pull wins because it downloads compressed layers (~330MB for main)
directly into containerd. docker save exports uncompressed (~1.55GB)
even with --platform linux/amd64.

Reverted to approach #1 with timing markers for future analysis.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
davdhacs added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file docker Pull requests that update Docker code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant