Hey @VonRehberg, thank you for the PR.

Can you remove the test at

From the looks of it the change looks OK. It seems to stem from the time we only supported passive revocation, but since then support for active revocation was added by the community. In practice the way that is configured and works does seem to make the Passive boolean obsolete, and it seems to be just informational at the moment. I think there's improvements that can be done, but that would require some more work to feed it through, and doesn't need to be in this PR.

Hi, as this seemed to be stale I continued in #2327.

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}