Fix latest tag referencing non-existent 3.12-ubi8 by aroyoredhat · Pull Request #837 · sclorg/s2i-python-container · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix latest tag referencing non-existent 3.12-ubi8 - #837

Open
aroyoredhat wants to merge 1 commit into
sclorg:masterfrom
aroyoredhat:fix-latest-tag-dangling-reference
Open

aroyoredhat wants to merge 1 commit into
sclorg:masterfrom
aroyoredhat:fix-latest-tag-dangling-reference

Conversation

@aroyoredhat

@aroyoredhat aroyoredhat commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

The latest ImageStreamTag in python-rhel.json and python-rhel-aarch64.json currently references 3.12-ubi8, which does not exist as a defined tag in those files. This was likely left behind when 3.12-ubi8 was removed.

This PR updates the latest tag to point to 3.12-ubi9 (the highest non-minimal Python 3.12 tag available) and updates the description from "UBI 8" to "UBI 9" to match. The corresponding entries in imagestreams.yaml are also fixed.

Files changed:

  • imagestreams/python-rhel.jsonlatest.from.name: 3.12-ubi83.12-ubi9, description updated
  • imagestreams/python-rhel-aarch64.json — same fix
  • imagestreams/imagestreams.yamllatest field updated for both rhel and rhel-aarch64 entries

Related:

Made with Cursor

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Updates
    • Updated the latest Python 3.12 image streams to use Red Hat Universal Base Image (UBI) 9.
    • Applied the update to both standard and AArch64 image variants.
    • Existing image version labels and metadata remain unchanged.

The `latest` ImageStreamTag in python-rhel.json and
python-rhel-aarch64.json references `3.12-ubi8`, which no longer exists
in the imagestream definition. Update it to point to `3.12-ubi9` which
is the current highest non-minimal Python 3.12 tag available.

Also update the description from "UBI 8" to "UBI 9" to match, and fix
the corresponding entries in imagestreams.yaml.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hhorak

hhorak commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While moving to ubi9 (or even ubi10) for latest makes sense, I don't think that the 3.12-ubi8 being missing is actually expected -- @frenzymadness @phracek do you agree that 3.12-ubi8 should still exist? Maybe we should fix that problem first, only then looking at what latest references.

@hhorak

hhorak commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants