ENH: Adding docstub#71
Conversation
|
@lagru Happy to put this up, if you think you're ready for some more eyes on the project! |
|
Happy too! But could we wait until I've completed the minimal documentation (scientific-python/docstub#24)? I'd like to give first users at least a chance to grok the concepts involved. 😅 After that I'll release v0.3 and approve this. 😊 |
|
Sounds like a plan, thanks! |
lagru
left a comment
lagru
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, I released version 0.3.0.post0. After some annoying shenanigans, I had to make a post release. It seems that my deployment workflow didn't really agree with me tagging the same commit with 0.3.0rc0 and 0.3.0. I think while pushing the final release, setuptools still tried to use the 0.3.0rc0 instead of 0.3.0. Couldn't reproduce that locally.
So note to myself, always make sure that release tags point to different commits. Even if that means unnecessarily pushing something. 😅
3 participants
It's ready for the public usage, so time to list on the website
cc @stefanv @lagru