Conversation
Agreed. I think I saw you had a branch from a while ago where you were trying to get it to behave. I'll pick up that effort eventually :) Can we disable these automated Windows checks until they're fixed? I don't want anyone to get in the habit of seeing failed stuff and then casually thinking it's the "Windows tests that have always failed." IMHO, everything should pass when people contribute code and they shouldn't be desensitized to the failures. And then when the Windows checks are running and stable, we add them back in?
For this particular PR, I did setup the environment and had the Tox tests running on my Windows machine, but I was turned off on the ChromeDriver experience that I had. And things seemed to be a bit more... flaky and I couldn't determine exactly why. So I switched over to Linux just today and everything was smooth and worked as advertised. The Windows/Tox/ChromeDriver problems could totally be my fault... but it left a bad taste. That said, I did run the Lastly... I know I'm mixing PR and issue threads here, but if you had any comments on this question that I asked:
|
I could go either way here. I agree it's not good to get people used to expecting tests to fail, but it's also a constant reminder to us (now maybe you) that we should get our act together and fix the Windows tests. Whereas if we disable them and hide them, it might be easier to forget. Whichever way you want to go is probably fine - just remove
I think that's broadly my memory of it as well :(
Will take a look at the issue. |
ae05620 to
c8e5af6
Compare

This is to address #605