{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Decorator syntax for type casting in decorators - #490
Closed
emmeowzing wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
emmeowzing wants to merge 1 commit into
emmeowzing wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks! I think this looks like a duplicate of something already being discussed |
Author
|
Okay I'll remember that next time! |
Member
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

I don't know if this is the proper way to write this, but I was writing a decorator and thought, wait, if I can use
functools.wrapsas a decorator, why can't I usetyping.castas a decorator? I understand it's meant to be as fast as possible, but I'm sure decorating as in the following kind of way wouldn't slow things down too much. Also, I'm really just hoping to start the discussion, because I haven't been able to find anything about it on GitHub or by Googling.