bpo-n/a: Updated ccbench.py used to assess multithreading by Sophist-UK · Pull Request #32135 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

bpo-n/a: Updated ccbench.py used to assess multithreading - #32135

Closed
Sophist-UK wants to merge 2 commits into
python:mainfrom
Sophist-UK:patch-1
Closed

Sophist-UK wants to merge 2 commits into
python:mainfrom
Sophist-UK:patch-1

Conversation

@Sophist-UK

Copy link
Copy Markdown

As used in faster-cpython/ideas#328.

Guido asked me to submit my changes as a PR so that the enhancements would be available to others.

Because this is not a PR on Python product code - but rather an update of an incidental performance measurement script - an issue number is not relevant.

As used in faster-cpython/ideas#328.

Guido asked me to submit my changes as a PR so that the enhancements would be available to others.
@the-knights-who-say-ni

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Sophist-UK

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I would have commented sooner had I known that this was about to happen. It would have been helpful if someone had commented in this PR that this was being considered so that I would have been notified and might have had a chance to comment before it happened.

I believe it was clear from the faster-cpython/ideas#328 that the ccbench script is still useful - because it clearly identifies an ongoing performance issue when multithreading with one or more CPU-heavy threads, and indeed it was @gvanrossum Guido himself who requested this PR.

That said, I do understand that performance scripts do not really have a place in the cpython source code repo, but unfortunately I do not have the time to rework the updated ccbench script for the pyperformance suite, so I guess it is going to just disappear.

@ericsnowcurrently

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@hugovk ^^^

@hugovk

hugovk commented Feb 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants