bpo-737999 Fix codeop.compile_command docstring - #3179
abenkovskii wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
codeop.compile_command actually accepts symbol="exec" too
|
Hello! I can’t review right now, but wanted to say you might get more attention by opening a new doc bug instead of recycling an old ticket that’s already closed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with Éric. @abenkovskii could you please open a new issue? bpo-737999 was closed 14 years ago so it would be better to discuss your ptahc in a new issue.
Also, we don't need a NEWS entry for this.
|
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
|
I removed the " needs backport to 3.6" label, the 3.6 branch no longer accept bugfixes (only security fixes are accepted): https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches |
|
@abenkovskii I agree with Berker, could you please open a new issue and remove the NEWS entry? |
|
Closing as there hasn't been any response to multiple requests for a bug report to be opened. Please feel free to re-open this PR or create a new one to address the existing comments. Thanks! |
|
@csabella Would you mind creating a doc ticket for this? |

codeop.compile_command actually accepts symbol="exec" too
https://bugs.python.org/issue737999