{{ message }}
bpo-43795: Document stable_abi.txt format and contents#29956
Merged
ambv merged 3 commits intopython:mainfrom Dec 10, 2021
Merged
bpo-43795: Document stable_abi.txt format and contents#29956ambv merged 3 commits intopython:mainfrom
ambv merged 3 commits intopython:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
Member
|
Petr, it would be helpful to explain under which circumstances an entry can be removed -- or that entries cannot be removed, even private |
Member
Author
|
That's a good idea, but IMO this comment should focus on the specifics of the |
Member
Actually I think it should be stated here, in this file, as well. It is much more directly useful here. |
Member
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

See discussion here: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/64VOMHNR37N4HVPWAHKHJM4UFYJPVKSV/
(bpo-43795 is closed, but I think reusing it is OK for a comment-only change.)
https://bugs.python.org/issue43795