GH-100112: avoid using iterable coroutines in asyncio internally by kumaraditya303 · Pull Request #100128 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 6 additions & 16 deletions Lib/asyncio/tasks.py
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_tasks.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
import re
import sys
import traceback
import types
import unittest
from unittest import mock
from types import GenericAlias
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -274,6 +275,20 @@ async def coro():
loop.run_until_complete(fut)
self.assertEqual(fut.result(), 'ok')

def test_ensure_future_task_awaitable(self):
class Aw:
def __await__(self):
return asyncio.sleep(0, result='ok').__await__()

loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
self.set_event_loop(loop)
task = asyncio.ensure_future(Aw(), loop=loop)
loop.run_until_complete(task)
self.assertTrue(task.done())
self.assertEqual(task.result(), 'ok')
self.assertIsInstance(task.get_coro(), types.CoroutineType)
loop.close()

def test_ensure_future_neither(self):
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
asyncio.ensure_future('ok')
Expand Down