Syntax Compatibility Strategy document#251
Conversation
flodolo
left a comment
flodolo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A couple of questions, but in general it looks good to me.
Pike
left a comment
Pike
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the update.
I have one more general thought, but not pressing right now: Should we be explicit about not allowing insta-break changes? I can see people wondering "Dude, I can also just break stuff, what's then?", might be good to make that explicit?
The only other thing I found was that it'd be nice to backport the changes you made to post 1.x at the bottom to the introduction part. I took a stab at that, feel free to put something else in there. Nothing blocking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the em dash here. I could go with spaces around it, but I know that's debated spelling.
3 participants
This document is based on my conversations with @flodolo and @Pike. The goal is to document the compatibility strategy for introducing and removing syntax features.