GitHub Community
All GitHub Copilot plans are now on usage-based billing [FAQ] #197089
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 484 comments 719 replies
-
|
So the answer is basically: if you hit your limit too quickly, you should upgrade and pay more? I get why GitHub moved to usage-based billing, but the numbers feel way off compared to the previous system. I had only two short sessions in the VS Code extension, with maybe 2–4 prompts total, and somehow that already consumed 210.5 AI Credits/Tokens/Whatever. Under the old model, that kind of usage would barely make a dent in my monthly quota. Now it feels like a handful of normal interactions can burn through a noticeable percentage of the month's allowance. What worries me, and most of the users, isn't paying for usage. It's not knowing what a few everyday prompts are going to cost. If developers can't reasonably predict their consumption, it's hard to trust Copilot as a tool they'll use throughout the month. Honestly, this feels like the kind of change that pushes people to look at other providers or even go directly to the model vendors instead of using Copilot as their main AI tool. More transparency around how credits are consumed in real-world VS Code workflows would go a long way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Are you able to get the refund? It seems we pass the refund windows. Still waiting |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Previously, I would just finish using up my Pro+ in a month. This month, after my Pro+ ran out, I upgraded to Max, and that also quickly ran out, plus an extra $20. The total came to $159 (39 + $100 + $20). It only lasted a few days, and I won't use it again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I thought I was the only person but literally in less than a day I consumed the MONTHLY usage. this DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE!!! IS ALMOST A SCAM!!!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
no ,I raise the ticket ,no one response,no the haiku4.5nis the only model I can use,and I did my payment... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don’t truly understand what’s going on here all I know is I was talked to like I’m some monster by open AIs gpt it was quite literally a day I don’t want to remember coming from ai I want help to get my old gpt back from before this morning I want nothing to do with all the strict I’m coming after you if you ever try to m make a cent off of your imagery that in myself with help from many as I models came up with in my head. I should be able to do with my imagery what I want and not fear persecution over someone else’s holier than thou standards if I’m being honest I’m homeless I live in my car at times so the thought that I could |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My GitHub account is associated with Fu-Jie, and I have been a long-time annual subscriber. My annual membership was originally set to expire in approximately two months. Earlier today (June 1, 2026), I clicked the "Refund" button in my account settings out of curiosity—not with the intention of immediately cancelling. I expected this action would lead to a confirmation page, not process the refund directly. However, the refund was executed immediately without any secondary confirmation prompt. I believe this is a design flaw in the refund workflow. Any action affecting payment and subscription status should include an explicit confirmation step to prevent unintended consequences from accidental clicks or exploratory actions. The absence of this basic safeguard led to the unexpected cancellation of my membership. To clarify: My request is not about renewal, but about the value of my current active contract. My existing membership had not yet expired and still had nearly two months of service remaining. Given recent changes to GitHub's billing policies, the terms and benefits under my current contract hold unique value during this remaining period. Once refunded and cancelled, renewing would not provide the same conditions. Given the above, I request that my original membership status and expiration date be restored, and I strongly recommend that your team improve the refund process by adding a necessary confirmation step. I look forward to your reply. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Eu também fiz isso no passado e ocorreu o mesmo, eles nem perguntam, te cancelam na hora. Muito louco isso. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @Fu-Jie, Thank you for writing in and explaining the situation. We understand from what you shared that clicking the refund button processed immediately without a confirmation step, and that this was not your intent. We appreciate you flagging this as a UX concern. I've noted this feedback and shared with internal teams for investigation. Regarding restoring your previous subscription: this falls outside what I'm able to action directly. We cannot resolve account related issues in this public forum, and I'm sharing this information with the appropriate team to review whether your original subscription and expiration date can be reinstated. I'll follow up once I have more information. Thank you for your patience. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
one afternoon pro+ limit 85% 
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Same here the costs are exploding in just a couple of days. It is expected that some raises are necessary but these exceptional higher use of the Agents models and costs are way out of balance |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
did the same |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Eventually you will also have to pay the real price there. (See https://isaiprofitable.com) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok thanks Melvin |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Subject: Large day-to-day difference in Copilot usage for similar work Hello, I am reporting a large difference in Copilot usage between two recent sessions on the same repository. On 2026-05-31, I was able to work through a long session and the usage remained within a range that felt predictable. On 2026-06-01, a session that felt comparable or smaller in visible scope consumed much more of my quota. From my point of view the difference is easy to verify and does not match the apparent amount or difficulty of the work performed. I understand that internal context, tool payload, or other service-side factors may exist, but the current accounting behavior is not transparent enough for planning real project work. Please clarify whether the accounting model changed or whether hidden context growth is being billed in a way that users cannot see. I can provide screenshots, approximate session times, and a short written comparison of the two sessions. 8 hours not heavy work... Regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That is a "them" issue. They should not have made a product with high value, low cost, tie it into systems that a majority of developers use, push it at every turn, then yank the proverbial rug out saying "Oops! Too expensive." |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I mean, it's immoral but also entirely predictable and a classic business strategy. You were effectively all on a discounted preview. If you look at API costs on any frontier model, it is obvious MS was eating over 90% subsidy here. MS may live on a mountain of money but the board would never approve of this forever. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's the strategy, right? 2/3 of the people move on, 1/3 of them pay more so it's enough to cover everyone who left as far as money coming in and they have 1/3 of the usage. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My brother's company uses them and are staying with them because of their increased security so I think it's just a way to free up access for them while charging them more than just simply using the API |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@dobrowolskijaroslaw1-sys |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Dumbest decision ever.... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Guess what? It's called effective management, hah |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I upgraded to GitHub Pro ($48/year) but downgraded it back to Free because I cannot subscribe to Copilot at this time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Switch to claude code |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
but at the new consumption rate, that should give you about two days worth !!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hm, wondering if there will be similar changes for the many Copilot variants in M365 and general Microsoft products in the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@DanielRuf 👋🏻 Thanks for the question. Our team here supports GitHub Copilot specifically, and we don't have visibility into billing plans for Microsoft 365 Copilot or other Microsoft products. For questions about M365 Copilot, Microsoft's product and support channels would be the best resource. I am assuming this was posted in jest, but answering with added context for you or any other users where the info may be helpful. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I had faith in you.. Honestly, I regret not taking the refund offer you made. I genuinely think you're going to lose at least 80% of your client base. This is so ridiculous. It's far better to pay in real money and not by token. The base usage is ridiculously low. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I hear you.. Sound like a trap indeed. So sad and uneven |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The new pricing model is outright robbery!!! I've already canceled my GitHub Copilot plan subscription!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think it is more of a pendulum; yes, intially a lot of people will leave, but I have a feeling they will come back... eventually. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
most likely they won't for a fairly simple reason... you have set your whole workflow on copilot, adjusted every single part to your needs and you had to, forcefully, to change to another app, another workflow, another settings and so on.... once you got used to that new one, you won't be coming back even if the older one is better just because you are tired to going back and forth... you most likely won't be doing any of this. you will stick to the new one and start adjusting yourself |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
|
I'm using VS Code with GitHub Copilot and I chose LLM GPT 5.4 Mini, but the platform is deducting the cost of Gemini 3.5 Flash, and because of that, my credits are disappearing without me using them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm currently using SONET 4.6 and it's charging me for GPT 5.4 mini, are you kidding me? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@jakteixeiraf 👋🏻 Hi there, Thank you for reporting this — I want to make sure we understand what's happening. To clarify: you selected GPT 5.4 Mini in VS Code Chat, but your usage report shows charges attributed to Gemini 3.5 Flash. Is that correct? A couple of things to be aware of:
Could you please:
If the CSV confirms you're being charged for a model you didn't select for those specific interactions, please share that detail and we'll investigate further. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
the admin itself is a f*****g bot :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as disruptive content.
This comment was marked as disruptive content.
-
|
How in the hell can 1 prompt which last month would barly cost a cent, now take up $4.51. this is ununsable and needs rolling back. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes one small UI bug fix 1,50$ lmao |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Imagine , 2 calls , 550 credits so if i'm in Pro plan = 3 commands -_- |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The new pricing model is outright robbery!!! I've already canceled my GitHub Copilot plan subscription!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Check out the input/output costs for some of the agents, it's insane. Claude Sonnet is 300 input, 1500 output, 30 for cache. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So why has the Pro plan reduced its usage limit by almost 100 times compared to before? I also discovered that the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Brother you can't even run hundreds of thousands of tokens on a middling, non-Agentic model for $10/month. As someone who has used independent providers and hosted my own locally, frontier models are staggeringly expensive. Power users were eating up thousands and thousands of dollars in model use. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Except they did do that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You still got the year you paid for, they're just opting out of offering it going forward. I'm not trying to defend MS' actions here, just the logic behind them and how predictable it was. Have you seen what OAI or Anthropic API key rates are? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The logic/strategy was more or less a bait and switch. No one would pay the rates they wanted so they got everyone in on the cheap, then raised the prices. With entire companies burning their full year's budget on tokens in 3 months and then moving on from AI, they'll have to figure out a way to make this cheaper. I am fully aware of what it costs and all, but that's not my problem to solve. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's just it they didn't get the year they paid for, they changed the terms in the middle of the contract. So youre running your mouth and don't even know what they did. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
In case anyone is curious on the value comparison, this is what I am seeing on the $10 plan using GPT-5.4:
The 100 credits is an upper estimate of what I have been seeing if you assume larger prompts. I have seen as low as 10 credits and as high as 60 so far today. On average I seem to hover around 33 credits per prompt. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as disruptive content.
This comment was marked as disruptive content.
-
@github Community Admin And what if the output is completely useless? Users still have to pay for it—and on top of that, they then have to spend additional time fixing the mistakes in an often lengthy and expensive response. Furthermore, the creativity is completely lost, if you constantly have to monitor your token consumption and then realize, that your tokens are gone, before you even reach a viable result. You really should overthink that, otherwise you will loose a lot of customers... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Join the $10Club :) I am not going to change it at all. I just want to see where it goes. I hope they change their way of billing and continue to support the developers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
GPT-5 mini lol |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
In the previous thread about Usage-based Billing it seemed that a common gripe people had was that unused tokens do not roll-over into the next month. To my knowledge, the topic was never addressed by GitHub. Are GitHub able to disclose the factors contributing to this decision? While GitHub make a valid point regarding the convenience of having one bill and one set of usage controls—I’ve opted to stick to Pro+, burn through my allocated credit in a week, and then pivot to using OpenRouter for the remainder of the month. OpenRouter offers a similar set of advantages that Copilot has over other providers. It can be used within the same VS Code interface. Plus it has more models and credit rolls-over for up to a year. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Try opencode (has a web ui and vscode plugin) with openrouter as provider. Add some specialized agents and you're off. You can even mix and match providers as you wish. Basically supports all of them since if not supported directly you can input any openAI standard API as a custom provider. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That may have been true some time ago. I can say with absolute certainty that using OpenRouter within VS Code is as seamless as using Copilot’s own models. If you ask Google today, the AI response will likely give you some outdated info about requiring an extension for it to work. So I understand the skepticism. Creating an account is free. Why not give it a try using one of their free models? That’s what I did last month when I was weighing out my options. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
what do you mean? get token. connect in VSCode. all AIs that support tools connected throuhg standard VSCode can use 100% of tools there. vision, files, everything. from gemini class models to deepseek or anything, local or cloud, does not matter. as long as they speak OpenAI API. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
@aidannairn may i know how did you get the option to opt pro+ , i set the budgets but iam strugling to upgrade to pro_, could you please help me on to get pro+ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Posting here so I can still subscribe to the chaos |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
is that you? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've been a paying Copilot user and this new credits system is simply unacceptable. In less than 5 hours of normal work today — the very first day of the new billing — I've already burned through 50% of my monthly plan. This is not a pricing change, this is a bait and switch. We paid for a tool, and overnight it became something we can't afford to use the way we always have. I'm canceling my subscription unless this is reverted or seriously reconsidered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
@alesanGreat @esp-dev may i know how did you get the option to opt pro+ , i set the budgets but iam strugling to upgrade to pro_, could you please help me on to get pro+ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@pradeepramesh123 about 2 months ago I upgraded to pro+, there was simply an option to upgrade, settings > billing and licensing > licensing, but now iam free :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@pradeepramesh123 the max plan makes no sense, for this money codex is cheaper and practically unlimited, the max plan would be enough for me for a week |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@esp-dev @alesanGreat I would like to upgrade to copilot pro+ on vscode i got an option to upgrade but when i click on it , the page has been redirected to limits but there i dont see an option to upgrade, 
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We are not the main target customer anymore. If you read the news, you can see that large companies are paying millions for this type of service, they don't need users like us. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You're right Microsoft is trusted by a lot of companies but I don't think they realize when you do customers like this they remember it |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Time to ditch Microslop then and go with linux! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Well, my IT lead already looks where to limit Github Usage and try to figure out if it was a necessary usage. Actually you need good models like Opus in Enterprise context, but if time isnt crucial or you havent a customer who spends tons of money for development, I see no reason to use GitHub Copilot anymore. Its too expensive now |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
The way GitHub Copilot’s pricing has suddenly jumped is going to backfire on them, and they risk losing a huge number of subscribers. To be fair, this isn’t necessarily the fault of the current management team - if there has been a leadership change. The real issue is that the previous pricing model was set far too low, creating an unrealistic baseline. When you anchor users at a certain price point for so long and then increase it to multiple times the original amount overnight, people naturally start looking elsewhere. That’s not just a pricing adjustment; that’s a shock to the system. And in a market where alternatives like Claude Code and GPT‑based Codex tools are already strong, switching becomes very easy. If Copilot isn’t careful, this move could push developers straight into the arms of competitors. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
that's already what's happenning, haven't you seen everyone discussing alternatives |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They don't care they make billions of dollars lol |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You make a fair argument but they wanted us all out of here for their other app they are offering for enterprise users. I forgot the name. It's very disrespectful for us as customers but their nose follows the billions they can make with enterprise not the peanuts they were gaining with us. We at least help them improve their model for cheap but now that I'm out, I can tell you that the competitors are much better. Good luck MS. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm truly baffled by people who think a super-megacorp like GitHub (see: Microsoft) hasn't calculated exactly how much this decision would cost them, both in money and in PR, has had people from multiple professions evaluate the pros and cons, and finally decided that it would be profitable to go on with it. Upping the price to your product from 200-300% overnight isn't a decision you take on the basis of "let's try it and see what happens" if you're a corporation. It's a very calculated move that has the goal of dropping "dead" weight that costs you more than it's worth. This process started months ago, when GitHub limited model access for the various subs. Remember when we had access to a boatload of models? Premium included? Yeah. The issue has been that agentic runs eat tokens like crazy, and it simply wasn't profitable to have everyone be able to use every model. The restriction didn't work apparently, so this was the step nr.2:
Does it feel sh!tty on a personal, consumer level? 101%, I'm very disappointed as someone who's been using Copilot since its beta and never once changed. And this whole situation left a very bad taste, a slimey, disgusting, mega-corpo taste. But in the end of the day, I'm probably some 0.00000X % in some spreadsheet, so I guess whatever, wasn't expecting some special consideration. Just another reminder of why corporations are always portrayed as corrupted, evil entities in all futuristic, dystopian movies. But hey, at least this finally gave me the incentive to try competing products, currently evaluating Claude and Codex. Hope GitHub gets the same dedication and goodwill from its enterprise clients. Or not, idgaf. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Iam a student and i am using ur student plan |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Wirklich wirklich extrem traurig was gerade geschieht durch das neue Nutzungslimit! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Too few exclamation marks to be taken into consideration. And not even a "1" between them? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Welcome to the New Era, Basicaly Microsoft set a price point on what Agentic Coding will be, in doing so they have set a base level price point on all software and software development aswell as how projects will be evaluated and audited in future, Source code will be worth more and it will cost more for developers and companies to create larger programs and platforms. It took me a moment to realise the full gravity of what they had done and why, Not saying i agree with the price change (i belive they rushed it much like googles chatbot AI feature was rushed and not what it was actualy supposed to be) I will Contine to code and develop and keep my Project alive the good old manual way, the SuperVibe Code push was good while it lasted and i was able to conquer alot while i could. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can anyone explain why I am showing 468 included credits, but the models show 298.11 credits...? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello, I accidentally purchased the GitHub Copilot Pro subscription today (June 20, 2026) and immediately cancelled the subscription. Since I am requesting this within the 7-day refund window on the very same day of the charge, I would like to request an immediate, full refund back to my original payment method rather than keeping the access until the next billing cycle. Please process the full refund as soon as possible. Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The current Copilot subscription changes have crippled and limited the service's usefulness for meaningful tasks. I have only used Copilot's models twice this month. The first time, I used a model for a narrowly focused task to minimize cost, but I found it burned 50% of the budget on the first request to establish a plan! The second time was because Copilot had switched to "auto" without noticing, burning additional tokens. GPT 5.4 mini cost as much as GPT 5.4? Both pricing at 6x!? I do not know which task would be usable within the limits currently in place. I have supplemented my use of Copilot with Ollama. I have used more local AI than ever due to the changes. I have not used Copilot this month because there is no way to budget a task under the allowance. These changes have made outsourcing LLM usage risky. I am not getting value for the subscription. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oh Hi Mark |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Are these coming to Education Benefits anytime or that remains unavailable? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
отлично что есть комменты |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We pay for GitHub Enterprise subscription and several Copilot Business seats. Still, we have been told by paid support to come to this page, as the only way to get support / follow-up on GitHub Copilot budget management... So posting here the initial support ticket content (https://support.github.com/ticket/enterprise/105/4486562) We are struggling to understand our options to properly configure allowed credits usage per user and per entity. Our main account is being used by 3 of our internal departments (let's call it deptA, deptB and deptC). We have been watching the dedicated webinar about budget management (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfMAtF0sMS8) but are still unclear about our options to address below use cases.
Overall, it seems mandatory and urgent that we get the capability to split the Global AICs shared pool into subpools (at any level, with inclusion/exclusion) for finer-grain credits management. Today it seems impossible to properly address such use cases (amongst others), so the billing has evolved and options to properly manage it are just missing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
When can I apply for a new personal plan? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
-
Fuked up plans same like people build it! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you, you can keep your subscription.
…On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 8:07 PM RashadAhmed1991 ***@***.***> wrote:
image.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a8c131c-81ca-428c-95d7-deb39d9c040f>
Fu
*ked up plans same like people build it! bullshit scammers! I'm leaving
this f*cking shit.
IDIOTS
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#197089?email_source=notifications&email_token=ARVFS37YHVBI7YJIEBYEAUT5BPABRA5CNFSNUABIM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2ENFZWG5LTONUW63SDN5WW2ZLOOQXTCNZUGIYDEOBYUZZGKYLTN5XKOY3PNVWWK3TUUVSXMZLOOSWGM33PORSXEX3DNRUWG2Y#discussioncomment-17420288>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARVFS34S4V7H75AP4QAYJKD5BPABRAVCNFSNUABIKJSXA33TNF2G64TZHMZTAMJVG4ZTGNBUHNCGS43DOVZXG2LPNY5TCMBRGQZTMMBVUF3AE>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
🆕 Community Manager Update: June 16, 2026
Hello everyone,
We're reopening sign-ups for GitHub Copilot Student, Pro, Pro+, and Max plans gradually over the next couple of weeks for new subscribers. If you've been waiting to get started with Copilot, select the plan that fits your needs. If your preferred option isn't available yet, check back soon.
If you find that you're using more than what's included in your current plan, we've made some updates to help you get the best experience: upgrade to unlock more included usage or pay as you go and stay on your current plan.
We've updated the body of this discussion to reflect updates regarding new sign-ups, usage and billing. Please find answer…