{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2023. It is now read-only.
Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Interesting, it sounds like the logic in stackContainsType has a flaw. My intent was to not recurse into a type which we already processed, but I suppose the logic should really be that we don't recurse into a Property that we have already processed. If I get some time, I'll take a look at this. Perhaps one of the core JayData developers can provide more insight. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Deal with recursive data types in the model binder config compiler and query builder. If the type is already on the query builder stack, then skip it.