Walking the DOM by ockley · Pull Request #291 · javascript-tutorial/da.javascript.info · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions 2-ui/1-document/03-dom-navigation/1-dom-children/solution.md
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions 2-ui/1-document/03-dom-navigation/1-dom-children/task.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,23 +2,23 @@ importance: 5

---

# DOM children
# DOM børn

Look at this page:
Se på følgende side:

```html
<html>
<body>
<div>Users:</div>
<div>Brugere:</div>
<ul>
<li>John</li>
<li>Pete</li>
<li>Lisbeth</li>
<li>Mikkel</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
```

For each of the following, give at least one way of how to access them:
- The `<div>` DOM node?
- The `<ul>` DOM node?
- The second `<li>` (with Pete)?
For hver af de følgende, giv mindst en måde at tilgå dem:
- `<div>` DOM noden?
- `<ul>` DOM noden?
- Den anden `<li>` (med Mikkel)?
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1. Yes, true. The element `elem.lastChild` is always the last one, it has no `nextSibling`.
2. No, wrong, because `elem.children[0]` is the first child *among elements*. But there may exist non-element nodes before it. So `previousSibling` may be a text node.
1. Ja, det er sandt. Elementet `elem.lastChild` er altid det sidste - det har ikke nogen `nextSibling`.
2. Nej, det er ikke sandt, fordi `elem.children[0]` er det første barn *mellem elementer*. Men der kan eksistere ikke-elementer før det. Så `previousSibling` kan være en tekstnode.

Please note: for both cases if there are no children, then there will be an error.
Bemærk: for begge tilfælde, hvis der ikke er nogen børn, vil der være en fejl.

If there are no children, `elem.lastChild` is `null`, so we can't access `elem.lastChild.nextSibling`. And the collection `elem.children` is empty (like an empty array `[]`).
Hvis der ikke er nogen børn, er `elem.lastChild` `null`, så vi kan ikke tilgå `elem.lastChild.nextSibling`. Og samlingen `elem.children` er tom (ligesom et tomt array `[]`).
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ importance: 5

---

# The sibling question
# Spørgsmålet om søskende

If `elem` -- is an arbitrary DOM element node...
Hvis `elem` -- er en tilfølglig DOM element node...

- Is it true that `elem.lastChild.nextSibling` is always `null`?
- Is it true that `elem.children[0].previousSibling` is always `null` ?
- Er det sandt at `elem.lastChild.nextSibling` altid er `null`?
- Er det sandt at `elem.children[0].previousSibling` altid er `null`?
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1 @@
We'll be using `rows` and `cells` properties to access diagonal table cells.
Vi vil bruge `rows` og `cells` egenskaberne til at tilgå diagonale tabelceller.
Loading