Hi - thanks for your contribution. Before anything else, can you please read and sign the CLA? We can't take your contribution without it.

I've had a quick scan of the PR and have a few high level comments to make before getting into detail.

1. I don't understand the purpose of the "GeoBusiApiContext" class (and it doesn't have any JavaDoc) - it only appears to change the API base URL. Can you explain it's purpose so we can provide better feedback?
2. Using the raw 'Object' type for the document body is not ideal. We need a (slightly) stronger type to better represent the contents of a HTTP payload.
3. Adding support for properties-file based authentication appears to be separate from the core purpose of this pull request, can you please separate it out into a different PR so we can discuss & process them atomically?

There are some other, smaller, things to mention that I'll add once I hear back. Most of the team will likely be away over the holiday period so please bear with us if we don't respond immediately!

And thanks again for your contribution! You've obviously invested a fair bit of work! 👍

Hi,
Thanks for your comment. I had signed the CLA and sorry that, this is my first contribution in GitHub, I don't know how to separate into two PRs. (>_<)
May I re-send the pull request twice ? If so, I will think again about HTTP Body type how to define and add JavaDoc of GeoBusiApiContext.
About GeoBusiApiContext, following are my considerations:

1. I think that Google Api for Work was different with Google Map Api, so that they using same context to describe may be not good.
2. I tried to don't define new context, but it was hard to let others or me to understand easily.

Merry Xmas and enjoy holiday ! (^_^)

Hey Gavin, sorry it's taken so long to circle back. Is this still useful? If yes, please update this patch so I can land it. Thanks!

Closing this out as old.