Minor formatting tweaks - #491
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not a native speaker 😬, but I believe that "...will only receive published releases" and "... will receive published releases only" have different meanings, and that the current text is correct in this case. /cc @gjtorikian
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @izuzak!
I’m a native English speaker. English is a weird language, with lots of special cases. (It’s due to its “mutt” like, hybrid nature.)
There are certainly situations in which a change like this would change the meaning of the sentence. In this case, I do not believe the meaning of this sentence changes; therefore, my edit was purely based on preferred style.
That said, after a re-read of this edit, I’ve just thought of a better way to phrase the sentence. So, hang on a moment, and I’ll have this fixed in a few! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rewritten with clearer phrasing in the latest commit!
|
Thanks @Zearin 📝 🍰 Other than that one comment -- this looks good to me. Would love it if @gjtorikian could take a look at these suggestions as well, though 😸 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 to rewriting it to emphasize push access over pull (as we do in other parts of the site).
It took me a while to parse what this is saying, though. How about:
Information about published releases are available to everyone. Only users with push access will receive listings for draft releases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like it better than my last edit! Will fix in a minute…
|
Good stuff! Really appreciate the attention to using backticks. I made one slight suggestion for the intro paragraph. |
|
🍰 |
|
w00t w00t! 😄 |
3 participants
No description provided.