Missing advisories for npm packages from CVE-2024-4067 · Issue #4548 · github/advisory-database · GitHub
Skip to content

Missing advisories for npm packages from CVE-2024-4067 #4548

Closed

Description

@aarongoldenthal

The npm packages braces and micromatch have been reported as susceptible to CVE-2024-4067. While the CVE and advisory are officially "unreviewed", the vulnerabilities have been clearly established and reported to the maintainers with no response here and here.

Given the current state of NVD data and the lengthy backlog of CVE's needing review, this advisory should be promoted and mapped to the applicable npm packages given the additional supporting data (it is currently not mapped to any npm packages, which is inaccurate).

Activity

  1. aarongoldenthal commented on Jun 30, 2024

    @aarongoldenthal
    Author

    After further review, while there seems to be some questions still floating around about the viability of this CVE, the packages themselves were updated to protect against it, so not sure why they should not be mapped to this advisory.

  2. jayvdb commented on Aug 22, 2024

    @jayvdb

    Hi @aarongoldenthal and @darakian and @hauserkristof, yesterday #4713 was merged, which I guess is why GHSA-952p-6rrq-rcjv now says "Github Reviewed", and we've had one PR here to escalate this further #4714 .

    There is feedback from the maintainer at micromatch/micromatch#264 (comment)

    And my initial investigation concludes that they maintainer is correct that this advisory is problematic. micromatch/micromatch#264 (comment)

  3. darakian commented on Aug 22, 2024

    @darakian
    Contributor

    So, this CVE was assigned by Checkmarx
    https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4067
    if the goal is to get the CVE revoked then you should really reach out to them. That said, I think the best route forward from where we are is to wait for the 4.0.8 release and to update the advisory with that as a fixed release. Not ideal I know, but it seems like the least friction to me. Thoughts?

  4. jayvdb commented on Aug 22, 2024

    @jayvdb

    I have emailed Checkmarx just now.

  5. darakian commented on Aug 22, 2024

    @darakian
    Contributor

    Right on. Keep me in the loop and let me know how that line evolves. 👍

  6. aarongoldenthal commented on Aug 23, 2024

    @aarongoldenthal
    Author

    Thanks @jayvdb and @darakian. My goal wasn't specifically to get the CVE revoked, but until a few days ago the advisory had a reference to micromatch in the description, but not a mapping to the project, so tools like OSV Scanner that use this database were not flagging it (although tools like OWASP Dependency Check were). That discrepancy was really my concern, but that is resolved as of a few days ago (and it is being flagged).

    I know there's a heated battle on whether it is or isn't a vulnerability, which I'm happy to let play out.

  7. hauserkristof commented on Aug 23, 2024

    @hauserkristof

    The fix has been merged!

    micromatch/micromatch#266

  8. darakian commented on Aug 23, 2024

    @darakian
    Contributor

    @hauserkristof advisory is updated with 4.0.8 as a patched version. Dependabot behavior should be updating now 👍
    GHSA-952p-6rrq-rcjv

  9. aarongoldenthal commented on Aug 23, 2024

    @aarongoldenthal
    Author

    Thanks all, I think this can be closed now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions