Fast build, simple clean, updated packages and fixed package creation#270
Conversation
|
#258 and my opinion is the default build and test cycle should be |
|
yep at least for proper release we need rebuild |
|
so in that case let's still keep |
|
fixed. can we merge this now? |
|
Point of order, invoking the "clean" target followed by the (newly edited) "build" target is not the same as telling MSBuild to |
|
hmm, are we sure? if the solution is |
|
ping :) |
+1 |
but |
1be20b4 to
c43a413
Compare
|
@tpetricek could you please have a look at this? |
|
@sideeffffect @pblasucci Is this ready to go in? |
|
@dsyme I think we're still trying to come to an agreement. Two options currently on the table:
versus
Personally, I'm not really concerned either way (Project Scaffold was always meant to be learning aide -- not an all-encompassing tool). But @forki raised the point and I wanted to give it full "airing". Especially, since there are some subtle differences between the two sequences, as seen here. What are your thoughts? |
|
@dsyme from my side we can merge @pblasucci I've found a SO answer that basically says that my changes won't hurt -- Rebuild = Clean + Build (step by step, project by project) |
|
Gonna merge this because -- hey -- we can always patch it later if there are issues (and folks are meant to be customizing their scripts anyway). |

No description provided.