Verdict: PASS

Two docs-only edits, both traced to real unresolved findings and both empirically verified against the actual extractor and resolver. Clean surgical work — the board reaches the zero-unresolved baseline you claim.

I ran the real code against both edited files rather than trust the PR description:

• Example-sentence neutralization (status-truth-synthetic-self-audit-claim-kinds-2026-07-03.md): extractStatusTruthClaimsFromText({path, text}) returns [] (0 claims) on the edited doc body. The backtick swap to PR #N is open / docs/plans/<name>.md is complete works because the PR regex (status-truth-detect.ts:56) requires #(\d+) and the plan regex (:99) restricts path segments to [\w-]+ — literal N and angle-bracketed <name> match neither. The placeholders are structurally inert, not just visually quoted.
• Stale plan status (2026-06-15-001-feat-monitoring-dashboard-phase-1-plan.md): resolvePlanConsistencyVerdict now returns {verdict: 'current', proposalEligible: false} for claimedState: complete + 9/9 units checked. complete is a member of SUPPORTED_PLAN_STATUSES (:1228), and the flip is grounded — the wiki confirms the dashboard has been live and shipping GHCR releases for weeks. The added completed: 2026-07-04 field matches the established convention (23/28 plans carry it), and the resolver's corrector only rewrites the status: line, so the manual field addition doesn't collide with any automated correction.

Blocking issues

None.

Non-blocking concerns

• The plan's Reconciliation block (lines 14–25) is now self-contradicting: it still asserts the plan "stays `code-complete-pending-verification` until [live-deploy verification] pass," while the frontmatter reads `complete`. The frontmatter is the truth the loop reads, so this doesn't reopen drift — but you've left a ghost in the prose narrating a state the file no longer occupies. If those (A)–(D) verification gates actually cleared, fold a one-line note into that block (or trim it) so a future reader isn't led to believe the plan is still pending. If they didn't all clear, complete is aspirational and the block is the honest record — worth a sentence either way. Not blocking; the machine-readable surface is correct.

Missing tests

None. Docs-only change with no behavioral surface — the existing status-truth-detect.test.ts suite already pins the extraction regexes and the complete+all-checked→current resolver path (:2967, :3038). No new code to cover.

Risk assessment: LOW

Two frontmatter/prose edits to non-executable Markdown. No workflow, dependency, permission, or run:-block surface touched; nothing reaches CI execution or a secret. Worst case of the residual concern is a reader misreading a stale prose paragraph — the resolver reads frontmatter, which is correct and verified.

Verdict: PASS

Re-review after dd3ab5b. The new commit closes the one thread I left open — cleanly, and without lobotomizing the historical record. The two edits I already verified last pass are byte-identical; only the Closure block is new. Re-ran the real extractor and resolver against the current tree to confirm nothing regressed.

The Closure block (lines 26–32) is the right move: rather than deleting the pending-verification prose and pretending the caveat never existed, you dated a superseding entry that explains why complete is now honest — weeks of production operation, hardening tracked in the dashboard/infra sessions, operator-rollout verification handed off to the gateway rollout tracker. The contradiction I flagged is resolved by layering truth with timestamps, not by erasing the ghost. That's the correct discipline for an append-only reconciliation log.

Empirical re-verification against the current head:

• Plan prose now carries the Closure block, which name-drops "the dashboard has been live" — but extractStatusTruthClaimsFromText({path, text}) returns 0 claims on the plan. No PR #<digits> and no docs/plans/<path>.md is <status> pattern in the new prose, so the block adds narrative without minting a resolvable claim. No self-inflicted drift.
• Plan-consistency resolver still returns {verdict: 'current', proposalEligible: false} (complete + 9/9 units checked). Unchanged from prior pass.
• Learning doc still yields 0 extractable claims. The backtick-neutralized PR #N / docs/plans/<name>.md placeholders remain structurally inert.

Board reaches the zero-unresolved / zero-drifted baseline the PR claims.

Blocking issues

None.

Non-blocking concerns

None. My prior concern (frontmatter/prose contradiction in the Reconciliation block) is resolved by the dated Closure entry.

Missing tests

None. Docs-only; no behavioral surface. The status-truth-detect.test.ts suite already pins the extraction regexes and the complete+all-checked→current resolver path.

Risk assessment: LOW

Three Markdown edits (frontmatter status + two prose blocks). No workflow, dependency, permission, or run: surface touched. Verified empirically that all three surfaces (plan prose, plan-consistency resolver, learning doc) emit zero unresolved signal. Nothing reaches CI execution or a secret.