Prepare 7.1 beta by mansona · Pull Request #11026 · ember-cli/ember-cli · GitHub
Skip to content

Prepare 7.1 beta#11026

Merged
mansona merged 50 commits into
betafrom
merge-release
May 22, 2026
Merged

Prepare 7.1 beta#11026
mansona merged 50 commits into
betafrom
merge-release

Conversation

@mansona

@mansona mansona commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

mansona and others added 30 commits April 21, 2026 22:34
# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
# especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
#
# Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
# the commit.
…-workflow

update ember-cli-deprecation-workflow to v4
update ember-welcome-page to v8 in app blueprint
update RELEASE with update-blueprint-deps commands
When a tag push fires (e.g. v7.1.0-alpha.2-ember-cli), github.ref_name
already contains the full tag name including the -ember-cli suffix.
The old verify-inputs step was blindly appending -ember-cli again,
producing the doubled tag v7.1.0-alpha.2-ember-cli-ember-cli.
The regex in the scripts only strips one trailing -ember-cli, so the
npm version resolved to "7.1.0-alpha.2-ember-cli", which does not exist
on the registry.

Fix:
- Use github.ref_type == 'tag' to detect tag-push runs and use
  github.ref_name directly (without appending the suffix again).
- Narrow push.tags filter from v* to v*-ember-cli so only the
  ember-cli package tags trigger this workflow.

Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli/sessions/4c5503b9-afaa-4ccd-8a15-f0501be7ea4b

Co-authored-by: kategengler <444218+kategengler@users.noreply.github.com>
Added instructions to check the Sync Output Repos GitHub action to ensure output repos are generated from the tag during release processes.
Add Sync Output Repos check to release instructions
mansona and others added 20 commits May 11, 2026 11:15
use semver-deprecate instead of internal code
# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
# especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
#
# Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
# the commit.
Promote Beta and update all dependencies for 7.0 release
# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
# especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
#
# Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
# the commit.
# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	package.json
#	packages/app-blueprint/files/package.json
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
#	tests/fixtures/addon/defaults/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/addon/pnpm/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/addon/typescript/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/addon/yarn/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/defaults/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/embroider-no-ember-data/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/embroider-no-welcome/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/embroider-pnpm/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/embroider-yarn/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/embroider/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/nested-project/actual-project/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/no-ember-data/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/npm/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/pnpm/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/typescript-embroider-no-ember-data/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/typescript-embroider/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/typescript-no-ember-data/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/typescript/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/with-blueprint-override-lint-fail/package.json
#	tests/fixtures/app/yarn/package.json
@mansona mansona requested a review from a team May 22, 2026 10:22

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

required?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes this is required because we needed code that would execute after a potential throw. But also, this isn't relevant to the prepare 7.1 beta PR, it should have been a comment on #10610 🙈

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't need to review all the code that goes into these PRs because they have already been reviewed, we're just checking for anything odd or stuff that looks broken with the dependencies

@mansona mansona requested a review from a team May 22, 2026 15:15
@mansona mansona merged commit a2c465d into beta May 22, 2026
70 checks passed
@mansona mansona deleted the merge-release branch May 22, 2026 15:18
@mansona mansona mentioned this pull request May 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants