Issue #20413: ASOF SEMI/ANTI Bindings by hawkfish · Pull Request #20433 · duckdb/duckdb · GitHub
Skip to content

Issue #20413: ASOF SEMI/ANTI Bindings - #20433

Merged
Mytherin merged 1 commit into
duckdb:v1.4-andiumfrom
hawkfish:asof-antisemi
Jan 8, 2026
Merged

Mytherin merged 1 commit into
duckdb:v1.4-andiumfrom
hawkfish:asof-antisemi

Conversation

@hawkfish

@hawkfish hawkfish commented Jan 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Add the RHS bindings when we are doing SEMI or ANTI ASOF joins with a predicate.

* Add the RHS bindings when we are doing SEMI or ANTI ASOF joins with a predicate.
@hawkfish
hawkfish requested a review from lnkuiper January 8, 2026 05:45

@lnkuiper lnkuiper left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@Mytherin
Mytherin merged commit 3d12269 into duckdb:v1.4-andium Jan 8, 2026
59 checks passed
@Mytherin

Mytherin commented Jan 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

github-actions Bot pushed a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
Fix duckdb/duckdb#20410: fix for RIGHT SEMI/ANTI - cannot fully label chain as found if there are non-equality predicates present in the join condition (duckdb/duckdb#20435)
Issue duckdb/duckdb#20413: ASOF SEMI/ANTI Bindings (duckdb/duckdb#20433)
github-actions Bot added a commit to duckdb/duckdb-r that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
Fix duckdb/duckdb#20410: fix for RIGHT SEMI/ANTI - cannot fully label chain as found if there are non-equality predicates present in the join condition (duckdb/duckdb#20435)
Issue duckdb/duckdb#20413: ASOF SEMI/ANTI Bindings (duckdb/duckdb#20433)

Co-authored-by: krlmlr <krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com>
@hawkfish
hawkfish deleted the asof-antisemi branch January 8, 2026 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants