Update circuitpython-repl-js by makermelissa · Pull Request #561 · circuitpython/web-editor · GitHub
Skip to content

Update circuitpython-repl-js - #561

Merged
makermelissa merged 1 commit into
circuitpython:mainfrom
makermelissa:main
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

Update circuitpython-repl-js#561
makermelissa merged 1 commit into
circuitpython:mainfrom
makermelissa:main

Conversation

@makermelissa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This updates to circuitpython-repl-js, which fixes some issues including fragmented headers and unreliable prompt detection in specific cases.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The change is a straightforward dependency bump with a consistent lockfile update and no apparent integration or consistency issues in the updated manifests.

Pull request overview

Updates the @adafruit/circuitpython-repl-js dependency to pick up upstream fixes related to fragmented headers and more reliable prompt detection, with the lockfile refreshed accordingly.

Changes:

  • Bump @adafruit/circuitpython-repl-js from 3.4.0 to 3.5.0 in package.json.
  • Update package-lock.json to the corresponding git commit plus refreshed transitive dependency versions.
File summaries
File Description
package.json Updates the CircuitPython REPL JS dependency ref to 3.5.0.
package-lock.json Locks @adafruit/circuitpython-repl-js to the new resolved commit and refreshes related transitive versions.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@makermelissa
makermelissa merged commit 6d95c46 into circuitpython:main Sep 2, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants