{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Conversation
Collaborator
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is more a question rather than a request for change but... how is this actually working internally?
if there isn't any .babelrc / babel.config.json then Next uses SWC instead of Babel. Furthermore, this example is enabling to minify using SWC instead of Terser. See Next.js Compiler
@LeoTexx is this example working with Babel (and just Next is internally opting out from any config in the monorepo) or is this example somehow magically working using next's SWC loader as opposed to babel-loader? if the former, we should make it explicit by adding a babel config.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This PR adds the nextjs plugin and an example using it