{{ message }}
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We probably shouldn't just be testing against
jruby-head.Per JRuby's roadmap, 1.7 is EOL'd and was 1.9.3 compatible, which we've also now EOL'd, so not including
jruby-1.7.JRuby 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2 are intended to be MRI 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5 compatible, which we do support, so including them here.
JRuby 9.0 seems to be non-trivially failing, which is curious! Will look into that before merging this — I think there have been a handful of issues here that jibe with that, so I'll investigate later. Just getting this PR open in the meantime!