Add OpenPaths provider#244
Conversation
Add OpenPaths (https://openpaths.io), an OpenAI-compatible model gateway, as a named provider. Mirrors the OpenRouter wiring exactly across the parallel provider lists (types, factory, config arrays) and reuses the generic OpenAI-compatible client. - types: add 'openpaths' to ProviderName, OpenPathsSettings, AutohandConfig.openpaths - providers: new OpenPathsProvider (base URL https://openpaths.io/v1, models endpoint /v1/models) - factory: openpaths case + getProviderNames/isValidProvider entries - config: validProviders, isModernConfig, getProviderConfig, defaultBaseUrlFor - tests: ProviderFactory coverage for openpaths Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 047147c948
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a new user selects OpenPaths in the setup wizard, requiresApiKey() still excludes openpaths, so onboarding skips promptApiKey()/validation and complete() writes only a model/baseUrl config. getProviderConfig() now requires an API key for openpaths, so the generated config is incomplete and OpenPaths requests run without authorization until the user hand-edits the config.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adding openpaths to getProviderNames() exposes it in the interactive provider picker, but checked ProviderConfigManager.configureProvider() and there is no openpaths case; selecting it when unconfigured prints the setup message and then returns without prompting for a key/model. The same manager also omits it from the cloud/API-key provider checks, so a partial model-only config is treated as configured and never offers an API-key action.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
What
Adds OpenPaths as a first-class named provider. OpenPaths is an OpenAI-compatible model gateway (like OpenRouter), so it slots into the existing provider architecture and reuses the generic OpenAI-compatible client.
https://openpaths.io/v1https://openpaths.io/v1/modelsopenpaths/auto(alsoopenpaths/auto-code,-fast,-reasoning)OPENPATHS_API_KEY(key page: https://openpaths.io/account)Changes
Additive and minimal — mirrors the OpenRouter wiring exactly across every parallel provider list.
src/types.ts: add'openpaths'toProviderName, addOpenPathsSettings, addopenpaths?toAutohandConfig.src/providers/OpenPathsProvider.ts: new provider (reuses the generic OpenAI-compatible client at the OpenPaths base URL; lists models from/v1/modelswith a static fallback).src/providers/ProviderFactory.ts:case 'openpaths'+ entries ingetProviderNames()/isValidProvider().src/config.ts:validProviders,isModernConfig,getProviderConfig(Record + api-key validation branch),defaultBaseUrlFor.src/onboarding/setupWizard.ts&src/core/agent/ProviderConfigManager.ts: addopenpathsentries to the exhaustiveRecord<ProviderName, ...>maps (required to keep typecheck green).tests/providers/ProviderFactory.test.ts: coverage foropenpaths(create configured / unconfigured,isValidProvider, updatedgetProviderNamesordering).Testing
tsc --noEmit(typecheck): passes.eslinton changed files: passes, no warnings.vitestProviderFactory + config suites: 41 passed.Note: I've reviewed CONTRIBUTING.md and COMMERCIAL.md — there's no CLA/DCO requirement and the changes are additive under Apache-2.0. If you do require a contributor agreement, I'm happy to sign your CLA.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code