[MINOR] Migrate RankValue to the package of the common class#265
Conversation
|
Please cc, just a minor change. @jerqi |
|
Could you give me a concrete example? Why do we need this pr? |
|
Because this static class is currently in |
|
Why do we migrate RankValue to the package of the common class if shuffle server and client won't use RankValue. |
|
I see what you mean, but I think it is necessary to set it as a separate class. Put it under the coordinator package ? |
Coordinator package is better. |
|
@smallzhongfeng Will you continue this pr? |
roryqi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks @smallzhongfeng

What changes were proposed in this pull request?
More standardized, and the class can be extended in the future.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
No need.