#1298 - Re-enable hold on failure (on coverage fail) by rzo1 · Pull Request #1523 · apache/stormcrawler · GitHub
Skip to content

#1298 - Re-enable hold on failure (on coverage fail)#1523

Merged
rzo1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
1298
Apr 25, 2025
Merged

#1298 - Re-enable hold on failure (on coverage fail)#1523
rzo1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
1298

Conversation

@rzo1

@rzo1 rzo1 commented Apr 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…docs to mention, that docker needs to be working.

Thank you for contributing to Apache StormCrawler.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes

  • Is there a issue associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with #XXXX where XXXX is the issue number you are trying to resolve?

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically main)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

  • Is the code properly formatted with mvn git-code-format:format-code -Dgcf.globPattern="**/*" -Dskip.format.code=false?

For code changes

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn clean verify?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file?

@rzo1 rzo1 requested a review from tballison April 22, 2025 13:40
@rzo1 rzo1 self-assigned this Apr 22, 2025
@rzo1 rzo1 added this to the 3.3.1 milestone Apr 22, 2025
@rzo1 rzo1 requested review from jnioche and mvolikas April 22, 2025 13:40
…docs to mention, that docker needs to be working.
@mvolikas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rzo1

rzo1 commented Apr 23, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@rzo1, what is the logic behind the new ratio numbers? (I have no experience with Jacoco :))

Coverage was deactivataed for quite a while now and the coverage dropped in some places. In addition, it sometimes depends on the OS environment (rounding) which executes the test. The defaults in this PR are the current coverage of the related modules. The only difference is, that if we go below these numbers, the build will actually fail ;-)

@mvolikas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rzo1 rzo1 merged commit a9cf45b into main Apr 25, 2025
@rzo1 rzo1 deleted the 1298 branch June 16, 2025 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants