Simple audio filters - #5230
Simple audio filters#5230
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
ghost
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
ghost
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
|
Is there proof that list comprehensions are really slower?!? Perhaps a timeit benchmark? According to CONTRIBUTING.md, algorithmic functions should return values and should not print or plot. Is there a way to separate the calculations into separate functions from plotting? In this way, we can put doctests on the algorithmic functions. |
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
|
@cclauss any updates on this? |
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
Signed-off-by: Martmists <martmists@gmail.com>
ghost
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
|
@Martmists-GH Thanks for your super cool contribution!!! I am OK with this version. If it is good for you, please let me know and I will merge it. |

Describe your change:
Add N-order IIR filter and Butterworth coefficients calculations
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.