2.x: Add assertValueSetOnly and assertValueSequenceOnly to TestObserver + TestSubscriber by vanniktech · Pull Request #6010 · ReactiveX/RxJava · GitHub
Skip to content

2.x: Add assertValueSetOnly and assertValueSequenceOnly to TestObserver + TestSubscriber#6010

Merged
akarnokd merged 3 commits into
ReactiveX:2.xfrom
vanniktech:assertValueSequenceOnly+assertValueSetOnly
May 18, 2018
Merged

2.x: Add assertValueSetOnly and assertValueSequenceOnly to TestObserver + TestSubscriber#6010
akarnokd merged 3 commits into
ReactiveX:2.xfrom
vanniktech:assertValueSequenceOnly+assertValueSetOnly

Conversation

@vanniktech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This basically copies the behavior of assertValuesOnly to the assertValueSet and assertValueSequence equivalent methods.

Coped the tests exactly from assertValuesOnly and adjusted them with the new added methods.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please have these like this: 2.1.14 - experimental


try {
to.assertValueSetOnly(Collections.singleton(5));
fail();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fail throws AssertionError so this test always passes. Perhaps throw a RuntimeException or add a fail message and verify the catch wasn't that message. Also this is overlooked in many other test using fail and catch (AssertionError) so it would be great if this could be fixed as well.

@akarnokd akarnokd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some changes would be great.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 17, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #6010 into 2.x will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #6010      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     98.28%   98.25%   -0.04%     
- Complexity     6074     6158      +84     
============================================
  Files           658      659       +1     
  Lines         44288    44522     +234     
  Branches       6145     6201      +56     
============================================
+ Hits          43529    43743     +214     
- Misses          228      233       +5     
- Partials        531      546      +15
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../java/io/reactivex/observers/BaseTestConsumer.java 100% <100%> (ø) 116 <2> (+2) ⬆️
.../operators/observable/ObservableFlatMapSingle.java 88.8% <0%> (-2.99%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...activex/internal/observers/QueueDrainObserver.java 97.43% <0%> (-2.57%) 21% <0%> (-1%)
...nternal/operators/observable/ObservableWindow.java 98% <0%> (-2%) 3% <0%> (ø)
.../io/reactivex/disposables/CompositeDisposable.java 98.14% <0%> (-1.86%) 39% <0%> (-1%)
...x/internal/operators/flowable/FlowablePublish.java 97.44% <0%> (-1.71%) 11% <0%> (ø)
...rnal/operators/observable/ObservableSwitchMap.java 93.61% <0%> (-1.6%) 3% <0%> (ø)
...l/operators/observable/ObservableFlatMapMaybe.java 88.88% <0%> (-1.31%) 2% <0%> (ø)
...ernal/operators/flowable/FlowableFromIterable.java 95.18% <0%> (-1.07%) 5% <0%> (ø)
...l/operators/observable/ObservableTimeoutTimed.java 99.15% <0%> (-0.85%) 3% <0%> (ø)
... and 19 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5ce21f4...cd99d70. Read the comment docs.

@vanniktech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Addressed your feedback.

* Assert that the TestObserver/TestSubscriber received only the specified values in any order without terminating.
* @param expected the collection of values expected in any order
* @return this;
* @since 2.1.14

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add - experimental.

* Assert that the TestObserver/TestSubscriber received only the specified values in the specified order without terminating.
* @param sequence the sequence of expected values in order
* @return this;
* @since 2.1.14

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add - experimental.

@vanniktech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit 5f1ce20 into ReactiveX:2.x May 18, 2018
@vanniktech vanniktech deleted the assertValueSequenceOnly+assertValueSetOnly branch May 18, 2018 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants