You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Minor spelling and grammar corrections in README #34
ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. And they will use up fewer system resources.
This snippet can be reworded for clarity and to fix a minor issue with parallel structure.
Proposed
ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. Additionally, they consume fewer system resources.
Expected behavior
Line 5:
> There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run concurrently.Line 9:
> ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. Additionally, they consume fewer system resources.
Actual behavior
Line 5:
> There is no throttling mechanism and so all jobs are started immediately and are all run currently.The intended word here is 'concurrently'. The distinction is important because _concurrent_ operations is the purpose of this module.Line 9:
> ThreadJob jobs will tend to run much faster because there is lower overhead and they do not use the remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do. And they will use up fewer system resources.This snippet can be reworded for clarity and to fix a minor issue with parallel structure.
Activity
krzydoug commentedon Apr 13, 2024
Still needs a slight adjustment. Either add 'same'
they do not use the same remoting serialization system as BackgroundJob jobs do.or
they do not use the remoting serialization system that BackgroundJob jobs do.