@AlexAndradeSan thank you for all your fantastic work on improving the spelling of the InnerSource patterns.

I have already merged most of your PRs, keeping the remaining 2 PRs open to get some feedback from you or the original authors of the patterns.

One general question:
I noticed (a bit too late unfortunately) that your PRs were targeting the spell-check-action branch, rather than the master branch. Was there any particular reason for this?

The spell-check-action branch was created as part of an experiment in #272 and it might not get merge into master in the near future.

But no problem at all, after all your PRs are merged into spell-check-action, I will make sure to get all of your spelling fixes ported over into master.

And yet another thing:
If you would like to chat more with other InnerSource practitioners, there is this slack channel that you can join if you like.

hi @AlexAndradeSan. Just wanted to check in again to ask if you saw my last comment above? ⬆️

Hi @AlexAndradeSan, I am getting back to this PR now, to see if we can get these changes merged?
Note that in the meantime we have renamed our mainline branch to main, which is where we would like to merge these changes into.

Status update:
I have ported most of your other fixes in to main via PR #327.

Might later also revert those changes from the spell-check-action branch, as they don't really belong there.

Hi @AlexAndradeSan. Based on the feedback about the Patlet of this pattern from @MaineC, I made a proposal for what I think will be an easier to understand variant of this Patlet.

I also reviewed all of your other changes in this PR again, and they look good. Thanks again for your help here!

Once you confirm that this looks ok, then I will merge these changes (FYI I will create a new PR for this, as we need the changes to be merged into the main branch, rather than the spell-check-action branch).

Closing this PR in favor of #334