I think we should rewrite the editor lists. Maybe we should have 3 categories instead of 2:

• Relatively simple text editors that also run your code (VScode, Thonny, Porcupine, Geany, ...)
• IDEs and editors that are likely too advanced for a beginner (Vim, Emacs, PyCharm, ...)
• Just text editors that don't run your code (gedit, pluma, nano, notepad++, ...)

We should also mention that it doesn't matter which editor you use: everyone has their favorite editor, and there's no "right" or "wrong" choice for what editor to use.

Also, even though I am the main author of Porcupine, I don't think we should recommend it over other editors in its category. We should instead tell people to have a quick look at each editor in the list and pick their favorite.

What do you think?

I have divided into three parts like you had hinted..Is that fine?

I like it! I will review in more detail later.

As I said, I really like what you wrote overall :)

This is a big pile of small nits. I mostly simplified the grammar. I want the tutorial to be usable for people who aren't good at english, so I try to write in a simple way.

Its fine...going through the suggestions I do feel that the sentences are more complex than I expected them to be.

I hope that I resolved all the conflicts...Incase I left somethingg out it would be great if you could bring that to my notice..

Thanks!