CWE - CWE-90: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') (4.19.1)
Home > CWE List > CWE-90: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') (4.19.1)  
ID

  • Home
  • CWE-90: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection')

    Weakness ID: 90
    Vulnerability Mapping: ALLOWED This CWE ID may be used to map to real-world vulnerabilities
    Abstraction: Base Base - a weakness that is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.
    View customized information:
    For users who are interested in more notional aspects of a weakness. Example: educators, technical writers, and project/program managers. For users who are concerned with the practical application and details about the nature of a weakness and how to prevent it from happening. Example: tool developers, security researchers, pen-testers, incident response analysts. For users who are mapping an issue to CWE/CAPEC IDs, i.e., finding the most appropriate CWE for a specific issue (e.g., a CVE record). Example: tool developers, security researchers. For users who wish to see all available information for the CWE/CAPEC entry. For users who want to customize what details are displayed.
    ×

    Edit Custom Filter


    + Description
    The product constructs all or part of an LDAP query using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended LDAP query when it is sent to a downstream component.
    + Common Consequences
    Section HelpThis table specifies different individual consequences associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact.
    Impact Details

    Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands; Read Application Data; Modify Application Data

    Scope: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability

    An attacker could include input that changes the LDAP query which allows unintended commands or code to be executed, allows sensitive data to be read or modified or causes other unintended behavior.
    + Potential Mitigations
    Phase(s) Mitigation

    Implementation

    Strategy: Input Validation

    Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

    When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."

    Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

    + Relationships
    Section Help This table shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction. In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore.
    + Relevant to the view "Research Concepts" (View-1000)
    Nature Type ID Name
    ChildOf Class Class - a weakness that is described in a very abstract fashion, typically independent of any specific language or technology. More specific than a Pillar Weakness, but more general than a Base Weakness. Class level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 1 or 2 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, and resource. 943 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic
    + Relevant to the view "Software Development" (View-699)
    Nature Type ID Name
    MemberOf Category Category - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 137 Data Neutralization Issues
    + Relevant to the view "Architectural Concepts" (View-1008)
    Nature Type ID Name
    MemberOf Category Category - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 1019 Validate Inputs
    + Modes Of Introduction
    Section HelpThe different Modes of Introduction provide information about how and when this weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which introduction may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the given phase.
    Phase Note
    Implementation REALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.
    + Applicable Platforms
    Section HelpThis listing shows possible areas for which the given weakness could appear. These may be for specific named Languages, Operating Systems, Architectures, Paradigms, Technologies, or a class of such platforms. The platform is listed along with how frequently the given weakness appears for that instance.
    Languages

    Class: Not Language-Specific (Undetermined Prevalence)

    Technologies

    Database Server (Undetermined Prevalence)

    + Demonstrative Examples

    Example 1


    The code below constructs an LDAP query using user input address data:

    (bad code)
    Example Language: Java 
    context = new InitialDirContext(env);
    String searchFilter = "StreetAddress=" + address;
    NamingEnumeration answer = context.search(searchBase, searchFilter, searchCtls);

    Because the code fails to neutralize the address string used to construct the query, an attacker can supply an address that includes additional LDAP queries.



    + Selected Observed Examples

    Note: this is a curated list of examples for users to understand the variety of ways in which this weakness can be introduced. It is not a complete list of all CVEs that are related to this CWE entry.

    Reference Description
    Chain: authentication routine in Go-based agile development product does not escape user name (CWE-116), allowing LDAP injection (CWE-90)
    Server does not properly escape LDAP queries, which allows remote attackers to cause a DoS and possibly conduct an LDAP injection attack.
    + Weakness Ordinalities
    Ordinality Description
    Primary
    (where the weakness exists independent of other weaknesses)
    Resultant
    (where the weakness is typically related to the presence of some other weaknesses)
    + Detection Methods
    Method Details

    Automated Static Analysis

    Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

    Effectiveness: High

    + Memberships
    Section HelpThis MemberOf Relationships table shows additional CWE Categories and Views that reference this weakness as a member. This information is often useful in understanding where a weakness fits within the context of external information sources.
    Nature Type ID Name
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 713 OWASP Top Ten 2007 Category A2 - Injection Flaws
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 810 OWASP Top Ten 2010 Category A1 - Injection
    MemberOf ViewView - a subset of CWE entries that provides a way of examining CWE content. The two main view structures are Slices (flat lists) and Graphs (containing relationships between entries). 884 CWE Cross-section
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 929 OWASP Top Ten 2013 Category A1 - Injection
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 990 SFP Secondary Cluster: Tainted Input to Command
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 1027 OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A1 - Injection
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 1308 CISQ Quality Measures - Security
    MemberOf ViewView - a subset of CWE entries that provides a way of examining CWE content. The two main view structures are Slices (flat lists) and Graphs (containing relationships between entries). 1340 CISQ Data Protection Measures
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 1347 OWASP Top Ten 2021 Category A03:2021 - Injection
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 1409 Comprehensive Categorization: Injection
    MemberOf CategoryCategory - a CWE entry that contains a set of other entries that share a common characteristic. 1440 OWASP Top Ten 2025 Category A05:2025 - Injection
    + Vulnerability Mapping Notes
    Usage ALLOWED
    (this CWE ID may be used to map to real-world vulnerabilities)
    Reason Acceptable-Use

    Rationale

    This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities.

    Comments

    Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is an appropriate fit. Do not try to 'force' a mapping to a lower-level Base/Variant simply to comply with this preferred level of abstraction.
    + Notes

    Relationship

    Factors: resultant to special character mismanagement, MAID, or denylist/allowlist problems. Can be primary to authentication and verification errors.
    + Taxonomy Mappings
    Mapped Taxonomy Name Node ID Fit Mapped Node Name
    PLOVER LDAP injection
    OWASP Top Ten 2007 A2 CWE More Specific Injection Flaws
    WASC 29 LDAP Injection
    Software Fault Patterns SFP24 Tainted input to command
    + References
    [REF-879] SPI Dynamics. "Web Applications and LDAP Injection".
    + Content History
    + Submissions
    Submission Date Submitter Organization
    2006-07-19
    (CWE Draft 3, 2006-07-19)
    PLOVER
    + Modifications
    Modification Date Modifier Organization
    2025-12-11
    (CWE 4.19, 2025-12-11)
    CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
    2024-02-29
    (CWE 4.14, 2024-02-29)
    CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Demonstrative_Examples
    2023-06-29 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Mapping_Notes
    2023-04-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Detection_Factors, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
    2023-01-31 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Description
    2022-10-13 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Observed_Examples
    2022-04-28 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Research_Gaps
    2021-10-28 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2020-12-10 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2020-08-20 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2020-06-25 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationship_Notes
    2020-02-24 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
    2019-06-20 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2018-03-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2017-11-08 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, Relationships
    2015-12-07 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2014-07-30 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
    2014-06-23 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships
    2012-10-30 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations
    2012-05-11 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Common_Consequences, Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
    2011-06-01 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Common_Consequences
    2010-06-21 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Demonstrative_Examples, Description, Name, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
    2010-02-16 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
    2009-10-29 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Other_Notes, Relationship_Notes
    2009-05-27 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Name
    2008-09-08 CWE Content Team MITRE
    updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Other_Notes, Taxonomy_Mappings
    2008-07-01 Eric Dalci Cigital
    updated Time_of_Introduction
    2008-07-01 Sean Eidemiller Cigital
    added/updated demonstrative examples
    + Previous Entry Names
    Change Date Previous Entry Name
    2008-04-11 LDAP Injection
    2009-05-27 Failure to Sanitize Data into LDAP Queries (aka 'LDAP Injection')
    2010-06-21 Failure to Sanitize Data into LDAP Queries ('LDAP Injection')
    Page Last Updated: January 21, 2026