Too Basic for Your Level Too Basic for Your Level | Zhiwei Li

Too Basic for Your Level | Generated by AI

Home 2026.06

Question: What do you think of this AI course arrangement?

Answer:

This looks like a Chinese online bootcamp format — likely targeting mid-career professionals or career switchers. Here’s my honest read:

Structure:

  • 4–5 month duration, ~5 hours live on Sundays + Q&A
  • Daily self-study 1–2 hrs (review/preview/assignments)
  • WeChat community support 10am–10pm
  • Replay available indefinitely

What’s decent:

  • Spread-out daily load (1–2 hrs) is sustainable for working adults
  • Incentivized TAs (paid per question answered) is a clever accountability hack
  • Unlimited replay is genuinely useful — you can revisit dense material

What concerns me, given where you are:

You’ve trained GPT-2 760M on MI300X, consumed ~1B tokens, built CLI agents, and are studying nanoGPT/nanochat internals. This kind of course is almost certainly pitched at people starting from zero — Python basics, “what is an API”, maybe fine-tuning via UI wrappers.

The format (live Sunday slots, WeChat group Q&A) strongly suggests it’s targeting Chinese learners who need structured accountability, not someone already operating at your level.

My actual recommendation: Skip it. The time cost (5 months × Sunday mornings) far exceeds what you’d gain. You’d be paying to sit through things you already know. Your ROI is higher from:

  • Reading DeepSeek v4 / MoE papers + implementing pieces
  • Andrej Karpathy’s YouTube + nanoGPT codebase
  • Building your own agent projects and shipping them

If you’re looking for community, the open-source ML Discord/Slack communities (EleutherAI, Hugging Face) are more aligned with your level than a WeChat group bootcamp.

Unless — this is a course you’re evaluating to sell or resell, or it covers a very specific domain (e.g., quantitative AI, legal AI, something niche). What’s the actual topic?