You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is partly prompted by some thoughts after my tweet in response to the question of how to improve Scala adoption.
Trusted cohesive library ecosystem. A lot of library usage is built on trust, most folks have been bitten at one points by a lib with some gotchas. This is why I think building trust and branding of libs with shared ethos is very important.
I agree that the current presentation leaves a lot to be desired, and like your approach.
shapeless-contrib and structures are both archived. I think catalysts and machinist are both on the way out. We could either flag these in their sections or leave a section for historical relics at the bottom.
We might also want to highlight distinguished projects. Currently, we have "full members" and "incubator." We might continue that distinction, or flag projects with a certain number of stars (~1k shows projects people tend to think of when they think of Typelevel). Some sort of visual distinction within the category would be good.
I am not aware of any analytics, but that could also be a nice addition.
Thank you for this great suggestion. Would you be interested in submitting a PR to make it happen, or let someone else run with the idea?
Thank you for this great suggestion. Would you be interested in submitting a PR to make it happen, or let someone else run with the idea?
Yeah, I'll try and open an in progress PR in time. Hopefully I'll get round to it within the week.
I am not aware of any analytics, but that could also be a nice addition.
I don't have a huge amount of experience with this, but I expect just bunging in google analytics could be a tad controversial. So will raise under a separate issue for further discussion.
Activity
rossabaker commentedon Dec 23, 2019
I agree that the current presentation leaves a lot to be desired, and like your approach.
shapeless-contrib and structures are both archived. I think catalysts and machinist are both on the way out. We could either flag these in their sections or leave a section for historical relics at the bottom.
We might also want to highlight distinguished projects. Currently, we have "full members" and "incubator." We might continue that distinction, or flag projects with a certain number of stars (~1k shows projects people tend to think of when they think of Typelevel). Some sort of visual distinction within the category would be good.
I am not aware of any analytics, but that could also be a nice addition.
Thank you for this great suggestion. Would you be interested in submitting a PR to make it happen, or let someone else run with the idea?
Slakah commentedon Dec 27, 2019
Thanks for the feedback @rossabaker .
Yeah, I'll try and open an in progress PR in time. Hopefully I'll get round to it within the week.
I don't have a huge amount of experience with this, but I expect just bunging in google analytics could be a tad controversial. So will raise under a separate issue for further discussion.
rossabaker commentedon Jan 2, 2020
Thanks! I agree with deferring the analytics to a different discussion.