<!-- Thank you for creating a tracking issue! Tracking issues are for tracking a feature from implementation to stabilization. Make sure to include the relevant RFC for the feature if it has one. If the new feature is small, it may be fine to skip the RFC process. In that case, you can use `issue = "none"` in your initial implementation PR. The reviewer will ask you to open a tracking issue if they agree your feature can be added without an RFC. --> Feature gate: `#![feature(casefold)]` This is a tracking issue for Unicode-aware case folding APIs in the standard library. These APIs do not perform NFC/NFKC normalization. <!-- Include a short description of the feature. --> ### Public API <!-- For most library features, it'd be useful to include a summarized version of the public API. (E.g. just the public function signatures without their doc comments or implementation.) --> ```rust // `core` impl char { pub fn to_casefold_unnormalized(self) -> ToCasefold; } mod char { #[derive(Debug, Clone)] pub struct ToCasefold { … }; impl Iterator for ToCasefold { type Item = char; … } impl DoubleEndedIterator for ToCasefold { … } impl FusedIterator for ToCasefold {} impl ExactSizeIterator for ToCasefold {} impl fmt::Display for ToCasefold { … } } impl str { pub fn eq_ignore_case_unnormalized(&self, other: &str) -> bool; } ``` ```rust // `alloc` impl str { pub fn to_casefold_unnormalized(&self) -> String; } ``` ### Steps / History <!-- For larger features, more steps might be involved. If the feature is changed later, please add those PRs here as well. --> (Remember to update the `S-tracking-*` label when checking boxes.) - [x] Implementation: #154742 - [ ] Final comment period (FCP)[^1] - [ ] Stabilization PR <!-- Once the feature has gone through a few release cycles and there are no unresolved questions left, the feature might be ready for stabilization. If this feature didn't go through the RFC process, a final comment period (FCP) is always needed before stabilization. This works as follows: A library API team member can kick off the stabilization process, at which point the rfcbot will ask all the team members to verify they agree with stabilization. Once enough members agree and there are no concerns, the final comment period begins: this issue will be marked as such and will be listed in the next This Week in Rust newsletter. If no blocking concerns are raised in that period of 10 days, a stabilization PR can be opened by anyone. --> ### Unresolved Questions <!-- Include any open questions that need to be answered before the feature can be stabilised. If multiple (unrelated) big questions come up, it can be a good idea to open a separate issue for each, to make it easier to keep track of the discussions. It's useful to link any relevant discussions and conclusions (whether on GitHub, Zulip, or the internals forum) here. --> - [ ] Is the lack of normalization a deal-breaker? What is the best way to deal with that? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154742#issuecomment-4479220168 [^1]: https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/feature-lifecycle/stabilization.html @rustbot label A-Unicode
Activity
Rollup merge of rust-lang#160041 - Jules-Bertholet:casefold-tracking,…
Unrolled build for #160041