Maybe rename private messages? · Issue #85 · projectfluent/fluent · GitHub
Skip to content

Maybe rename private messages? #85

Description

@stasm

We've seen some confusion about how to talk about private messages and their attributes. The message itself is not really private -- tools will still check if it exists. What's private is its interface: the value and any attributes.

Perhaps we could find a better wording to make this easier to understand? in #62 I originally proposed glossary messages; the feedback was that in the world of localization glossaries already have a defined meaning and it's better not to confuse people further.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions