FilesExpand file tree

 master

/

dtexample.py

Copy path

Blame

More file actions

Blame

More file actions

Latest commit

 

History

History

History

167 lines (115 loc) · 2.86 KB

 master

/

dtexample.py

Copy path

Top

File metadata and controls

• Code
• Blame

167 lines (115 loc) · 2.86 KB

Raw

Copy raw file

Download raw file

Open symbols panel

Edit and raw actions

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

"""Simple example using doctests.

This file just contains doctests both using plain python and IPython prompts.

All tests should be loaded by nose.

"""

import os

def pyfunc():

"""Some pure python tests...

>>> pyfunc()

'pyfunc'

>>> import os

>>> 2+3

5

>>> for i in range(3):

... print(i, end=' ')

... print(i+1, end=' ')

...

0 1 1 2 2 3

"""

return 'pyfunc'

def ipfunc():

"""Some ipython tests...

In [1]: import os

In [3]: 2+3

Out[3]: 5

In [26]: for i in range(3):

....: print(i, end=' ')

....: print(i+1, end=' ')

....:

0 1 1 2 2 3

It's OK to use '_' for the last result, but do NOT try to use IPython's

numbered history of _NN outputs, since those won't exist under the

doctest environment:

In [7]: 'hi'

Out[7]: 'hi'

In [8]: print(repr(_))

'hi'

In [7]: 3+4

Out[7]: 7

In [8]: _+3

Out[8]: 10

In [9]: ipfunc()

Out[9]: 'ipfunc'

"""

return 'ipfunc'

def ipos():

"""Examples that access the operating system work:

In [1]: !echo hello

hello

In [2]: !echo hello > /tmp/foo_iptest

In [3]: !cat /tmp/foo_iptest

hello

In [4]: rm -f /tmp/foo_iptest

"""

pass

ipos.__skip_doctest__ = os.name == "nt"

def ranfunc():

"""A function with some random output.

Normal examples are verified as usual:

>>> 1+3

4

But if you put '# random' in the output, it is ignored:

>>> 1+3

junk goes here... # random

>>> 1+2

again, anything goes #random

if multiline, the random mark is only needed once.

>>> 1+2

You can also put the random marker at the end:

# random

>>> 1+2

# random

.. or at the beginning.

More correct input is properly verified:

>>> ranfunc()

'ranfunc'

"""

return 'ranfunc'

def random_all():

"""A function where we ignore the output of ALL examples.

Examples:

# all-random

This mark tells the testing machinery that all subsequent examples should

be treated as random (ignoring their output). They are still executed,

so if a they raise an error, it will be detected as such, but their

output is completely ignored.

>>> 1+3

junk goes here...

>>> 1+3

klasdfj;

>>> 1+2

again, anything goes

blah...

"""

pass

def iprand():

"""Some ipython tests with random output.

In [7]: 3+4

Out[7]: 7

In [8]: print('hello')

world # random

In [9]: iprand()

Out[9]: 'iprand'

"""

return 'iprand'

def iprand_all():

"""Some ipython tests with fully random output.

# all-random

In [7]: 1

Out[7]: 99

In [8]: print('hello')

world

In [9]: iprand_all()

Out[9]: 'junk'

"""

return 'iprand_all'