Embedded integer doesn't get represented simply? · Issue #313 · jsonld-java/jsonld-java · GitHub
Skip to content

Embedded integer doesn't get represented simply? #313

Description

@garpinc

I have the following rdf

{
	<http://pk1> a <http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#KeySet> , <http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#PrimaryKey> ;
		<http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#priority> "6"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> .
	
	<http://pk2> a <http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#KeySet> , <http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#PrimaryKey> ;
		<http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#priority> "6"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> .
	
	<http://testc1> a <http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#ClassConcept> , <http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#MetadataConcept> , <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept> ;
		<http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary#primaryKey> <http://pk1> , <http://pk2> .
}

When I run it through json ld via frame I get

{
  "@context" : "http://cambridgesemantics.com/ontologies/2018/06/MetadataDictionary/ClassConcept",
  "uri" : "http://testc1",
  "type" : [ "metaframe:ClassConcept", "metaframe:MetadataConcept", "skos:Concept" ],
  "primaryKey" : [ {
    "uri" : "http://pk1",
    "type" : [ "metaframe:KeySet", "metaframe:PrimaryKey" ],
    "metaframe:priority" : {
      "type" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int",
      "@value" : "5"
    }
  }, {
    "uri" : "http://pk2",
    "type" : [ "metaframe:KeySet", "metaframe:PrimaryKey" ],
    "metaframe:priority" : {
      "type" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int",
      "@value" : "6"
    }
  } ]
}

Which does reflect the rdf above... But although metaframe is defined in the @context somehow it remains in the property where the property name should be simply "priority". In addition I would expect it to be instead

"priority" : 6

instead of the type/value object..

Is this a bug?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions