Describe the issue or suggestion

In the last code example, ImplementingInterfaces on https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/tour#object-programming, part of the comment text reads

/// Unlike other languages such as C# or Java, a new type definition is not needed
/// to implement an interface.

It isn't true of Java that one needs to have a new type definition - one can use an anonymous class to implement an interface.

(Apologies for using this template. The one in the '.NET feedback' section on the article page kept erasing my feedback.)