{{ message }}
Repository navigation
File exists: /usr/local/bin/serve #57
Description
I've serve installed on my computer:
$ which serve
/usr/local/bin/serveHence, when I do npm i -g --only=prod https-localhost, I get an error during the installation:
npm i -g --only=prod https-localhost
npm ERR! code EEXIST
npm ERR! syscall symlink
npm ERR! path ../lib/node_modules/https-localhost/index.js
npm ERR! dest /usr/local/bin/serve
npm ERR! errno -17
npm ERR! EEXIST: file already exists, symlink '../lib/node_modules/https-localhost/index.js' -> '/usr/local/bin/serve'
npm ERR! File exists: /usr/local/bin/serve
npm ERR! Remove the existing file and try again, or run npm
npm ERR! with --force to overwrite files recklessly.
npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR! /Users/user/.npm/_logs/2021-01-11T17_01_48_121Z-debug.logTo me, it would make sense if the binary was called https-localhost or similar. Currently, it is called serve.
Activity
Rename binary from `serve` to `https-localhost`
daquinoaldo commentedon Jan 16, 2021
Hi @TimDaub,
I agree to change the name for the same reason you spotted. I would change it to
sservesincehttps-localhostit's a bit long. Anyway, it's a good idea to keep them both since it is possible.The problem with changing the name is that it's a breaking change. I scheduled it in v5, in which there are many other breaking changes.
I'm running out of time in this period (sorry for the late answer btw). Would you like to contribute and help me in delivering this new version? I'm looking for both casual contributors and stable maintainers.
TimDaub commentedon Jan 19, 2021
I'm fine with sserve too, but consider that you might run into trouble in case you ever want to rename your library to that name: https://www.npmjs.com/package/sserve
I'm happy to help you resolve this issue here :)
daquinoaldo commentedon Jan 24, 2021
The name change will be included in
https-localhost v5.0.0. The plan for that version is a total refactor and a porting in TypeScript. As I said, I'm running out of time, and I don't really know whenv5will be out.ezekiel747 commentedon Nov 12, 2022
Hi, just wanted to suggest a different command name than "serve", maybe "serve-https"?
I've had this renaming done manually in the bin folder, since I need both the "serve" package and this one (awesome work, btw).
Thanks.
For now, if someone else needs to use both serve and https-localhost packages alternatively, just rename the symlinks.
(or any other name that makes sense)
TimDaub commentedon Nov 12, 2022
I ended up publishing ssl-serve which is a zero-config dev server for SSL connections, an old fork of zeit‘s serve. I don‘t really maintain it but it still works without problems.