You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hit six distinct blockers building a GraalVM native image of an application that uses the SDK's Quarkus reference server. Each one was only visible after the previous had been fixed, and none of them produced a useful error message at runtime: the application answers HTTP 500 and logs nothing.
Context: I am building an A2A server extension for Quarkus LangChain4j, which exposes a LangChain4j AI service as an A2A agent. It started from a stalled PR by another contributor, who is not involved in this work; that PR predates the 1.x SDK, and most of the current code is my own, bringing it to 1.2.0.Final and to GraalVM native image, which is a first-class target for Quarkus applications. The goal is to land the extension in quarkus-langchain4j proper, so this SDK would ship inside a released Quarkus extension.
#
Symptom
Root cause
My workaround
1
Detected a started Thread in the image heap. Thread name: MainEventBusProcessor
MainEventBusProcessorInitializer observes @Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class), which Quarkus fires during static initialization
veto the initializer, start the processor on StartupEvent instead
2
AgentCard specifies transport interfaces for unavailable transports: [JSONRPC]. Available transports: []
transports are discovered with ServiceLoader, and Quarkus builds native images with -H:-UseServiceLoaderFeature
register the providers at build time
3
every error response becomes HTTP 500
Gson reflects over ErrorDetail
register the spec packages for reflection
4
Generated message class "org.a2aproject.sdk.grpc.SendMessageRequest" missing method "getTenant"
protobuf reflects over the generated messages when parsing a request
register the generated messages for reflection
5
Generated message class "com.google.protobuf.Struct" missing method "newBuilder"
the generated messages are built out of protobuf's own well-known types
register com.google.protobuf too
6
No default configuration value found for: a2a.blocking.agent.timeout.seconds
META-INF/a2a-defaults.properties is not included in the image
register the resource
Worth noting for #4: this one is not gRPC-specific. I initially assumed a request is only parsed into a protobuf message when gRPC is the transport serving it, and made the registration conditional on gRPC being present. That broke every JSON-RPC-only native image, because the JSON-RPC path converts to protobuf internally as well.
The request
Would you consider shipping native-image reachability metadata (reachability-metadata.json, or reflect-config.json + resource-config.json) in the SDK jars? That would fix #3–#6 for every consumer, not just Quarkus ones, since GraalVM picks the metadata up automatically from META-INF/native-image/.
Blockers #1 and #2 are Quarkus-specific, but the SDK ships Quarkus reference modules, so they arguably belong to it too. For #1 in particular: starting a thread from an @Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class) observer is questionable in any mode, not only native. Quarkus fires that event during static init, which is the one place a live thread must not be created. Observing StartupEvent instead would be a one-line change.
Why consumer-side registration is fragile: a concrete case from this week
Because consumers have to name the SDK's packages themselves, the metadata silently drifts out of sync with the SDK.
Upgrading my extension from 1.1.0.Final to 1.2.0.Final, #987 (refactor!: resolve all split packages) moved ErrorDetail:
My reflection registration still named the old package, which no longer exists, so blocker #3 came straight back: every error response returned HTTP 500 again. All 41 of my JVM unit tests passed against 1.2.0. The failure only appeared in the native integration tests, and only on the two tests that assert an error response. Had the metadata lived in the SDK jars, it would have moved along with the class and nobody downstream would have noticed.
Verified against 1.2.0.Final
There is no reachability-metadata.json, reflect-config.json, native-image.properties, @RegisterForReflection or GraalVM substitution anywhere under src/main in the repository, and blockers #1, #2 and #6 still reproduce as described. MainEventBusProcessorInitializer still observes @Initialized(ApplicationScoped.class).
I would be glad to prepare a PR for the metadata, and separately for the StartupEvent change, if you agree with the direction, though I would rather confirm the shape you prefer before writing it.
Relevant log output
# 1: build time
Error: Detected a started Thread in the image heap. Thread name: MainEventBusProcessor
# 2: startup
java.lang.IllegalStateException: AgentCard specifies transport interfaces for unavailable
transports: [JSONRPC]. Available transports: []
# 4: request time, HTTP 500
Invalid request content: Generated message class
"org.a2aproject.sdk.grpc.SendMessageRequest" missing method "getTenant"# 5: request time, HTTP 500
Generated message class "com.google.protobuf.Struct" missing method "newBuilder"# 6: startup
java.util.NoSuchElementException: No default configuration value found for:
a2a.blocking.agent.timeout.seconds
Environment
a2a-java 1.2.0.Final (originally found on 1.1.0.Final)
@omatheusmesmo I'm not (and I doubt the rest of the core team is either) really familiar with all the GraalVM stuff. Is it normal for projects to ship this stuff? Or can it be handled in Quarkus?
And if we were to add the metadata, how would we keep it in sync when we make changes?
@omatheusmesmo I'm not (and I doubt the rest of the core team is either) really familiar with all the GraalVM stuff. Is it normal for projects to ship this stuff?
I can't say if it's normal or not.
Or can it be handled in Quarkus?
It can, we can use build items and similar resources to register for reflection etc.
And if we were to add the metadata, how would we keep it in sync when we make changes?
I think it would be a good idea to have Integration Tests running in the native mode, the "closed world", in the CI/CD, so then you are able to keep maintaining it.
Besides Quarkus, I think this would benefit final users and other projects that wants to work in the native mode without needing to deal with config files or annotations to getting this work, that's my pitch.
I can send a draft PR with the CI changes and the metadata if you agree.
What would be the benefit of this from the SDK perspective ? I'm not sure the SDK is meant to be used as is in a production environment. Also how would Quarkus or other framework deals with external dependencies for native image ?
Activity
kabir commentedon Aug 12, 2026
@omatheusmesmo I'm not (and I doubt the rest of the core team is either) really familiar with all the GraalVM stuff. Is it normal for projects to ship this stuff? Or can it be handled in Quarkus?
And if we were to add the metadata, how would we keep it in sync when we make changes?
omatheusmesmo commentedon Aug 18, 2026
Hi @kabir ,
I can't say if it's normal or not.
It can, we can use build items and similar resources to register for reflection etc.
I think it would be a good idea to have Integration Tests running in the native mode, the "closed world", in the CI/CD, so then you are able to keep maintaining it.
Besides Quarkus, I think this would benefit final users and other projects that wants to work in the native mode without needing to deal with config files or annotations to getting this work, that's my pitch.
I can send a draft PR with the CI changes and the metadata if you agree.
ehsavoie commentedon Aug 19, 2026
What would be the benefit of this from the SDK perspective ? I'm not sure the SDK is meant to be used as is in a production environment. Also how would Quarkus or other framework deals with external dependencies for native image ?