You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there any interest in supporting remote filesystems such as SFTP or Samba? If yes, I can implement them. However, I do not want to put in the time or the energy if this is not something Fossify File Manager is willing to accept and merge to mainline.
Why do you want this feature?
Remote filesystems are fairly common now, especially SFTP which is very easy to set up.
@ddpasa I cannot say whether there is an interest from maintainer's side, but there certainly is an interest from users' side - see #50.
I'm happy to implement it @chesio , but I don't want to do it before getting the approval from the maintainer that they are interested in merging such a feature. It is discouraging to put time and effort into something, only to be rejected as 'not interested'. It had happened to me before.
Activity
fossifybot commentedon Aug 21, 2026
Thank you for updating the issue.
chesio commentedon Aug 24, 2026
@ddpasa I cannot say whether there is an interest from maintainer's side, but there certainly is an interest from users' side - see #50.
ddpasa commentedon Aug 24, 2026
I'm happy to implement it @chesio , but I don't want to do it before getting the approval from the maintainer that they are interested in merging such a feature. It is discouraging to put time and effort into something, only to be rejected as 'not interested'. It had happened to me before.