Message 77962 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Content 
> Ah, I think I'm beginning to understand.  Thanks for the explanation.  So, 
> if I understand correctly, I should refactor the patch and just remove all 
> of the Py_off_t and just use off_t because the standard says that *is* the 
> type.  Correct?

Correct.