Message 71425 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Content 
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
> multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
> a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
> t.alive:" anyway.

So be it. I don't really want to do any renaming anyway. :)
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3352>
> _______________________________________
>

-- 
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."